Search for other papers by Stephen Gates in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Brain Sager in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael Khazzam in
Google Scholar
PubMed
those for hip and knee arthroplasty procedures. 1 The purpose of this review is to provide a summary of current methods for assessment of the glenoid and preoperative planning strategies for total shoulder arthroplasty. Radiographic imaging
Search for other papers by Arjun Sivakumar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Suzanne Edwards in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stuart Millar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dominic Thewlis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Search for other papers by Mark Rickman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
the studies passing the initial eligibility screening and assessed for eligibility using the same approach with disagreements discussed to reach a consensus. Quality assessment Quality assessment of the studies was conducted using the Cochrane
Search for other papers by Jason Trieu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chris Schilling in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Vincent’s Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia
Search for other papers by Michelle M. Dowsey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Vincent’s Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia
Search for other papers by Peter F. Choong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
in total knee replacement. Author Dong and Buxton 20 Novak et al 21 Slover et al 22 Gøthesen et al 23 Journal International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care Journal of Bone & Joint
Search for other papers by Maik Sliepen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matthijs Lipperts in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marianne Tjur in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre of Research in Rehabilitation (CORIR), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Denmark
Search for other papers by Inger Mechlenburg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
preventing or delaying orthopaedic diseases 1 , 2 as well as non-orthopaedic conditions. 3 Thus, the assessment of PA, in addition to pain and physical function, is suggested to be relevant and can offer reference values or provide patient feedback
Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Gothenburg, Sweden
Search for other papers by Georgios Tsikandylakis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Search for other papers by Soren Overgaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luigi Zagra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Gothenburg, Sweden
The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden
Search for other papers by Johan Kärrholm in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-operations (not only revision surgery, but all types of hip-related surgical procedures) was reported to be 2.2% within two years after a primary THA. In general, new technologies with proven clinical value have gained in popularity, but it remains difficult to
Search for other papers by Benedikt J. Braun in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bernd Grimm in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrew M. Hanflik in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Meir T. Marmor in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Peter H. Richter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrew K. Sands in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sureshan Sivananthan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
to aftercare measures. Technologies that contribute to optimization of these intervention phases answer the intervention need for digital solutions. Examples of such technologies include decision support systems, ePROM assessment, robotics, and
Search for other papers by Mohsen Raza in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Daniel Murphy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
St George’s, University of London, London, UK
Search for other papers by Yael Gelfer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology, also known as ‘additive manufacturing’ or ‘rapid prototyping’, is increasingly being utilized in the field of medicine. Its first reported medical use was in 1990 when a 3D model of
Search for other papers by Pierre Hoffmeyer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
(RAS) has introduced a new dimension to orthopaedic procedures. These technologies offer advantages such as enhanced accuracy in implant placement, reduced surgical invasiveness, and improved postoperative outcomes. Clearly the integration of AI
Search for other papers by Heiner Fangerau in
Google Scholar
PubMed
part of an ecosystem: a broader ethical and health technology assessment approach is needed . American Journal of Bioethics 2020 20 46 – 48 . ( https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2020.1820104 ) 37 Fangerau H Hansson N & Rolfes V
Search for other papers by David Constantinescu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by William Pavlis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael Rizzo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dennis Vanden Berge in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Spencer Barnhill in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Victor Hugo Hernandez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
has been widely reported in other settings ( 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ). Other fields, such as spinal surgery, have utilized this technology to monitor patient recovery kinetics following surgery ( 12 , 13 ). However, many studies have questioned their
