Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Reinier Feitz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Yara E. van Kooij in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marloes H. P. ter Stege in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Mark J. W. van der Oest in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J. Sebastiaan Souer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Robbert M. Wouters in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Harm P. Slijper in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Ruud W. Selles in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Steven E. R. Hovius in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hand–Wrist Study Group in
Google Scholar
PubMed
for improving outcomes: 3 ‘Without such a feedback loop, providers lack the requisite information for learning and improving’. We sought precise moments in the regular delivery of care to insert user-friendly feedback loops for patients, surgeons
Search for other papers by Marianne Arner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
emphasised that the primary focus for an NQR is to improve health care, since many surgeons tend to focus primarily on research. The main concept for quality registries is that registered data should be used as directly as possible in the care of patients, e
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Search for other papers by Jacobien H.F. Oosterhoff in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Search for other papers by Job N. Doornberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Machine Learning Consortium in
Google Scholar
PubMed
feedback loop to improve performance. We envision the plateau of productivity of the hype cycle as follows: AI-derived applications will facilitate data-driven personalized care for our patients, limiting surgeons’ bias, and empower shared decision
Search for other papers by Geke A. W. Denissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Liza N. van Steenbergen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wouter T. Lollinga in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Nico J. J. Verdonschot in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Dept. of Orthopaedics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Berend W. Schreurs in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Dept. of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Rob G. H. H. Nelissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
the registration can detect these misclassified procedures and provide a means to improve data quality within a feedback quality control loop. Registration of product number and batch number creates unique data registration and thus data quality. In