Search for other papers by Paolo Salari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrea Baldini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is a challenging procedure and is usually associated with worse results when compared with primary knee arthroplasty. 1 In this scenario, surgeons have to deal with different technical
Search for other papers by Emmanuel Thienpont in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is a challenging and complex procedure 1 , 2 from the initial surgical exposure to the component removal, bone stock restoration and implant selection. 3 , 4 As with primary TKA
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by A Prkić in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N P Vermeulen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shoulder and Elbow Unit, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Medische Kliniek Velsen, Velsen-Noord, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by B W Kooistra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by B The in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by M P J van den Bekerom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D Eygendaal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
years, TEA has undergone several changes concerning indications and operative technique, but the complication rate and the need for revision are still higher than after knee and hip arthroplasty ( 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ). For many surgical procedures
Search for other papers by Kavin Sundaram in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ahmed Siddiqi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Atul F. Kamath in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carlos A. Higuera-Rueda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
primary hip arthroplasty. 1 – 3 There has been renewed interest in variants of this technique including the trochanteric slide osteotomy (TSO), extended trochanter osteotomy (ETO), and the transfemoral approach for both septic and aseptic revision
Search for other papers by Xiang-Dong Wu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yixin Zhou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hongyi Shao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dejin Yang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sheng-Jie Guo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wei Huang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
satisfying radiological and clinical outcomes, while longer-term follow-ups are lacking ( 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ). However, compared with primary TJA, revision TJA remains a considerable challenge to orthopedic surgeons. Revision TJA is a
Search for other papers by Gilles Pasquier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matthieu Ehlinger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Didier Mainard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction The number of surgical revisions of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing 1 due to the steady increase in the number of TKA procedures. 2 , 3 The principal reasons for TKA revision are aseptic loosening, infection
Search for other papers by Thorsten Gehrke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mustafa Citak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mustafa Akkaya in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum poses a significant challenge for orthopedic surgeons, especially when faced with severe bone loss and failure of previous implants ( 1 , 2 ). The strategy for revising the acetabulum is
Osteoarticular Surgery Research, La Paz Hospital Health Research Institute – IdiPAZ (La Paz University Hospital – Autonomous University of Madrid), Madrid, Spain
Search for other papers by E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Primitivo Gómez-Cardero in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carlos A. Encinas-Ullán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
undergo TKA is also increasing. It is therefore highly likely that the rate of revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) will continue to increase in the future. 1 An rTKA is a highly complex surgical technique, with a high rate of complications and
Search for other papers by Patrick Butler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Josef Gorgis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Search for other papers by Bjarke Viberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Search for other papers by Søren Overgaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
revision and other patient-related complications. 3 Well-documented orthopaedic implants already exist on the market, yet new ones are still continually being introduced to obtain a higher market share and improve patient outcomes. 4 Even though
Search for other papers by Colby Foster in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Search for other papers by Christopher Posada in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bryan Pack in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Brian R. Hallstrom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Department of Industrial & Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Michigan, USA
Search for other papers by Richard E. Hughes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-prosthetic fracture, and revision. Sources of information include peer-reviewed literature, conference abstracts, industry, and arthroplasty registry reports. However, the generalizability of results in single-institution or single-surgeon studies can be limited. In
