satisfying radiological and clinical outcomes, while longer-term follow-ups are lacking ( 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ). However, compared with primary TJA, revision TJA remains a considerable challenge to orthopedic surgeons. Revision TJA is a
Xiang-Dong Wu, Yixin Zhou, Hongyi Shao, Dejin Yang, Sheng-Jie Guo, and Wei Huang
Colby Foster, Christopher Posada, Bryan Pack, Brian R. Hallstrom, and Richard E. Hughes
-prosthetic fracture, and revision. Sources of information include peer-reviewed literature, conference abstracts, industry, and arthroplasty registry reports. However, the generalizability of results in single-institution or single-surgeon studies can be limited. In
Emmanuel Thienpont
Introduction Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is a challenging and complex procedure 1 , 2 from the initial surgical exposure to the component removal, bone stock restoration and implant selection. 3 , 4 As with primary TKA
Luca Pierannunzii and Luigi Zagra
Introduction Bone loss is a major concern of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). While on the femoral side the problem is commonly solved by passing the defect through long stems seeking distal fixation in the healthy diaphysis, on the
Kavin Sundaram, Ahmed Siddiqi, Atul F. Kamath, and Carlos A. Higuera-Rueda
primary hip arthroplasty. 1 – 3 There has been renewed interest in variants of this technique including the trochanteric slide osteotomy (TSO), extended trochanter osteotomy (ETO), and the transfemoral approach for both septic and aseptic revision
Paolo Salari and Andrea Baldini
Introduction Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is a challenging procedure and is usually associated with worse results when compared with primary knee arthroplasty. 1 In this scenario, surgeons have to deal with different technical
Nicolas Bonnevialle, Florence Dauzères, Julien Toulemonde, Fanny Elia, Jean-Michel Laffosse, and Pierre Mansat
complication is always devastating with significant clinical and socioeconomic consequences. 2 The rate is higher after revision surgery than after a primary procedure and reaches close to 5% in cases of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). 4 , 5
Gösta Ullmark
mean Oxford Hip Score of 17.4 (12 to 32). The score was 26.7 (15 to 47) after one episode of dislocation at a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (1 to 20), 27.2 (12 to 45) after recurrent dislocation, 34.5 (12 to 54) after successful revision surgery and 42
Georgios Tsikandylakis, Maziar Mohaddes, Peter Cnudde, Antti Eskelinen, Johan Kärrholm, and Ola Rolfson
with a high risk of dislocation and/or revision situations, has limited long-term follow-up internationally and is still subject to uncertainty regarding polyethylene wear, intraprosthetic dislocation and implant fixation. 9 - 11 Fig. 1 The
Gilles Pasquier, Matthieu Ehlinger, and Didier Mainard
Introduction The number of surgical revisions of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing 1 due to the steady increase in the number of TKA procedures. 2 , 3 The principal reasons for TKA revision are aseptic loosening, infection
