Filter

Refine by date

—

Refine by category

  • Print
  • Save

Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 108 items for :

  • resurfacing x
Clear All
Francesco Benazzo Sezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico – Unità di Traumatologia dello Sport, U.O Ortopedia e Traumatologia Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Lombardy, Italy
Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Lombardy, Italy

Search for other papers by Francesco Benazzo in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Loris Perticarini Sezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico – Unità di Traumatologia dello Sport, U.O Ortopedia e Traumatologia Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Lombardy, Italy

Search for other papers by Loris Perticarini in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Eugenio Jannelli Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo – Pavia, Lombardy, Italy

Search for other papers by Eugenio Jannelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Alessandro Ivone Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo – Pavia, Lombardy, Italy

Search for other papers by Alessandro Ivone in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Matteo Ghiara Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo – Pavia, Lombardy, Italy

Search for other papers by Matteo Ghiara in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi Sezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico – Unità di Traumatologia dello Sport, U.O Ortopedia e Traumatologia Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Lombardy, Italy

Search for other papers by Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

Introduction The variability in the decision about whether to resurface the patella in total knee replacement (TKR) is influenced by different factors including geographic location, training of surgeons, implant design and level of constraint

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
Knee
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.190075
Volume/Issue:
Volume 5: Issue 11
Open access
Kara McConaghy Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for other papers by Kara McConaghy in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Tabitha Derr Implant Research Core, School of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for other papers by Tabitha Derr in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Robert M. Molloy Cleveland Clinic, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for other papers by Robert M. Molloy in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Alison K. Klika Cleveland Clinic, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for other papers by Alison K. Klika in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Steven Kurtz Implant Research Core, School of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Exponent, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for other papers by Steven Kurtz in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Nicolas S. Piuzzi Cleveland Clinic, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for other papers by Nicolas S. Piuzzi in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

The management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been a matter of considerable debate in the orthopaedic community. 1 – 4 Surgeons tend to approach the patella with one of three general mindsets: always resurface the patella

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
Knee
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.200156
Volume/Issue:
Volume 6: Issue 10
Open access
Feng Xie The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

Search for other papers by Feng Xie in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Shuya Sheng Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Search for other papers by Shuya Sheng in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Jeya Palan Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Search for other papers by Jeya Palan in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Hemant G Pandit Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Search for other papers by Hemant G Pandit in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

dissatisfaction, and litigation ( 4 ). Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) is an attractive alternative to standard stemmed THA. HRA are metal-on-metal (MoM) articulations, and various in vitro assessments have confirmed a low wear rate with the use of MoM

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
Hip
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-23-0099
Volume/Issue:
Volume 9: Issue 8
Open access
Bart G. Pijls Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Bart G. Pijls in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Jennifer M. T. A. Meessen Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Jennifer M. T. A. Meessen in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Keith Tucker Implant Performance Committee, England and Wales National Joint Registry, ODEP, Beyond Compliance and MHRA Expert Advisory Group for MoM Prostheses, London, UK

Search for other papers by Keith Tucker in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Susanna Stea Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy

Search for other papers by Susanna Stea in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Liza Steenbergen Dutch Arthroplasty Register (Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten, LROI), 's- Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Liza Steenbergen in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Anne Marie Fenstad The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

Search for other papers by Anne Marie Fenstad in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Keijo Mäkelä Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland

Search for other papers by Keijo Mäkelä in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Ioan Cristian Stoica Foisor Orthopaedics Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania

Search for other papers by Ioan Cristian Stoica in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Maxim Goncharov VJRR, Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, St Petersburg, Russia

Search for other papers by Maxim Goncharov in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Søren Overgaard Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

Search for other papers by Søren Overgaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Jorge Arias de la Torre Departament de Salut, Agència de Qualitat i Avaluació Sanitàries de Catalunya (AQuAS), Barcelona, Spain
CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
Instituto de Biomedicina (IBIOMED). Universidad de León, León, Spain

Search for other papers by Jorge Arias de la Torre in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Anne Lübbeke Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by Anne Lübbeke in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Ola Rolfson Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

Search for other papers by Ola Rolfson in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Rob G. H. H. Nelissen Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Rob G. H. H. Nelissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

loosening than the first-generation MoM-THR and thus became the preferred bearing over MoM. 1 - 4 Around the turn of the millennium, a second generation of MoM-THR, including resurfacings, was introduced with the claim of reduced wear and superior

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
General Orthopaedics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180078
Volume/Issue:
Volume 4: Issue 6
Open access
Gautier Beckers Department of Surgery, Hospital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for other papers by Gautier Beckers in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Marc-Olivier Kiss Department of Surgery, Hospital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Clinique Orthopédique Duval, Laval, Quebec, Canada

Search for other papers by Marc-Olivier Kiss in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Vincent Massé Department of Surgery, Hospital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Clinique Orthopédique Duval, Laval, Quebec, Canada

Search for other papers by Vincent Massé in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Michele Malavolta Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Department of Knee Surgery, Casa di Cura Solatrix, Rovereto, TN, Italy

Search for other papers by Michele Malavolta in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Pascal-André Vendittoli Department of Surgery, Hospital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Clinique Orthopédique Duval, Laval, Quebec, Canada

Search for other papers by Pascal-André Vendittoli in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

reproduce the pre-arthritic knee anatomy by resurfacing the knee joint (resecting bone and cartilage thickness to match that of the implant) ( 11 ). Compared to systematic MA, personalized techniques better restore joint surface orientations, native

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
Knee
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-23-0215
Volume/Issue:
Volume 9: Issue 7
Open access
Christiaan P. van Lingen Isala Clinics, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Zwolle, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Christiaan P. van Lingen in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Luigi M. Zagra IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Luigi M. Zagra in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Harmen B. Ettema Isala Clinics, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Zwolle, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Harmen B. Ettema in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Cees C. Verheyen Isala Clinics, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Zwolle, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Cees C. Verheyen in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

Introduction Large-head metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings were re-popularised in the late 1990s with the introduction of modern hip resurfacing (HR), followed shortly afterward by large metal head total hip arthroplasty (THA). The introduction of

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
Hip
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.1.160014
Volume/Issue:
Volume 1: Issue 10
Open access
Bryant Ho Hinsdale Orthopaedics, Hinsdale, Illinois, USA

Search for other papers by Bryant Ho in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Judith Baumhauer University of Rochester, Department of Orthopaedics, Rochester, New York, USA

Search for other papers by Judith Baumhauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

patients with more advanced arthritis, operative management has centred on arthrodesis of the first MTP joint. Multiple joint-sparing procedures such as joint arthroplasty or resurfacing have been described with inconsistent results. Pathophysiology

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
Foot & Ankle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.2.160031
Volume/Issue:
Volume 2: Issue 1
Open access
Richard N. de Steiger Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, SAHMRI, Adelaide, Australia
School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Australia

Search for other papers by Richard N. de Steiger in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Stephen E. Graves School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Australia

Search for other papers by Stephen E. Graves in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

significantly higher rate of revision for the ASR Hip Resurfacing System and the following year the ASR XL Acetabular System. 8 The identification of these particular prostheses was associated with a substantial reduction in their use by surgeons and the

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
General Orthopaedics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180071
Volume/Issue:
Volume 4: Issue 6
Open access
Charles Rivière Clinique du Sport, Bordeaux-Mérignac, France
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for other papers by Charles Rivière in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
William Jackson Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by William Jackson in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Loïc Villet Clinique du Sport, Bordeaux-Mérignac, France
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for other papers by Loïc Villet in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Sivan Sivaloganathan Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
South-West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, UK

Search for other papers by Sivan Sivaloganathan in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Yaron Barziv Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Shamir Medical Center, Zriffin, Israel

Search for other papers by Yaron Barziv in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Pascal-André Vendittoli Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Département de Chirurgie, Université de Montréal, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, Québec, Canada

Search for other papers by Pascal-André Vendittoli in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

Introduction The Kinematic Alignment (KA) technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an alternative surgical technique aiming to resurface knee articular surfaces. 1 , 2 Ultimately, the goal of KA is to alter the knee physiological

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
Knee
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.210042
Volume/Issue:
Volume 6: Issue 10
Open access
Markus Walther Schön Klinik München Harlaching – FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Harlachinger Straße, Munich, Germany
Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Muskuloskelettales Zentrum München (MUM), Marchionostraße, Munich, Germany
Justus Maximilian University Wuerzburg, König-Ludwig-Haus, Brettreichstraße, Würzburg, Germany
Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Strubergasse, Salzburg, Austria
Working Group Clinical Tissue Regeneration of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (DGOU), Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Markus Walther in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Oliver Gottschalk Schön Klinik München Harlaching – FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Harlachinger Straße, Munich, Germany
Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Muskuloskelettales Zentrum München (MUM), Marchionostraße, Munich, Germany
Working Group Clinical Tissue Regeneration of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (DGOU), Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Oliver Gottschalk in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Matthias Aurich Working Group Clinical Tissue Regeneration of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (DGOU), Berlin, Germany
Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), DOUW - Abteilung für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Ernst-Grube-Straße, Halle, Germany
BG-Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, Halle, Saale, Germany

Search for other papers by Matthias Aurich in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

( 127 ) and reported that the AOFAS score improved from 55.92 ± 9.52 to 74.67 ± 13.1 while the VAS decreased from moderate-to-mild pain. Based on these results, the authors concluded that metal resurfacing might be considered a valid option for OLT

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
Trauma
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-23-0075
Volume/Issue:
Volume 9: Issue 3
Open access