Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 22 items for :

  • post-market surveillance x
Clear All
Richard N de Steiger Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, SAHMRI, Adelaide, Australia

Search for other papers by Richard N de Steiger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Brian R Hallstrom Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative University of Michigan, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Search for other papers by Brian R Hallstrom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Anne Lübbeke Geneva Arthroplasty Registry, Geneva University Hospitals Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4 CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Anne Lübbeke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Elizabeth W Paxton Surgical Outcomes and Analysis Unit, Kaiser Permanente National Implant Registries 8954 Rio San Diego Drive, Suite, San Diego, California, USA

Search for other papers by Elizabeth W Paxton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Liza N van Steenbergen Dutch Arthroplasty Register (Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten (LROI)), Bruistensingel 230 | 5232 AD ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Liza N van Steenbergen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Mark Wilkinson Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, United Kingdom
National Joint Replacement for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, Isle of Man and the States of Guernsey (NJR)

Search for other papers by Mark Wilkinson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

withdrawn worldwide in 2010. This resulted in tighter regulations regarding the introduction of monitoring for new implants ( 13 ) demonstrating the critical role of registries in post-market total joint replacement surveillance. While many joint

Open access
M M Morlock Institute of Biomechanics, TUHH Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany

Search for other papers by M M Morlock in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
E Gomez-Barrena Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by E Gomez-Barrena in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D C Wirtz Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Search for other papers by D C Wirtz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A Hart London Implant Retrieval Centre, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK

Search for other papers by A Hart in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
J P Kretzer Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany

Search for other papers by J P Kretzer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Directive issued in 1993. The MDR requires post-market surveillance of all class IIb and III products by the manufacturers, who have to demonstrate the clinical safety of their products on a yearly basis. This will provide a substantially higher level of

Open access
Claus Varnum The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark

Search for other papers by Claus Varnum in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alma Bečić Pedersen Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

Search for other papers by Alma Bečić Pedersen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ola Rolfson The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register
Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

Search for other papers by Ola Rolfson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Cecilia Rogmark The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register
Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Department of Orthopedics, Malmö, Sweden

Search for other papers by Cecilia Rogmark in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ove Furnes The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Search for other papers by Ove Furnes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Geir Hallan The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Search for other papers by Geir Hallan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Keijo Mäkelä The Finnish Arthroplasty Register
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland

Search for other papers by Keijo Mäkelä in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Richard de Steiger Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), Adelaide, Australia
Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

Search for other papers by Richard de Steiger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Martyn Porter The National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man
Centre for Hip Surgery, Wrightington Hospital, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Trust, Lancashire, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Martyn Porter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Søren Overgaard The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register
Orthopaedic Research Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

Search for other papers by Søren Overgaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

recognized that enhanced post-market surveillance would be useful and an initiative called ‘Beyond Compliance’ was introduced in 2012. 58 It was named Beyond Compliance because this was voluntary and beyond the European regulatory requirements. The NJR

Open access
Tom Melvin Medical Officer, Health Products Regulatory Authority, Dublin, Republic of Ireland

Search for other papers by Tom Melvin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Marina Torre Engineer, Senior Researcher, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy

Search for other papers by Marina Torre in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

to their device. The clinical evaluation then informs the extent to which the device manufacturer is required to further examine their device once made available on the market, by means of post-market surveillance (PMS) or post-market clinical follow

Open access
Ann Alriksson-Schmidt Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences, Sweden

Search for other papers by Ann Alriksson-Schmidt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jonas Ranstam Mdas AB, Sweden

Search for other papers by Jonas Ranstam in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Otto Robertsson Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences, Sweden

Search for other papers by Otto Robertsson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Lars Lidgren Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences, Sweden

Search for other papers by Lars Lidgren in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

being introduced on the market. Despite this, of these 70 devices, 12 were subsequently subjected to FDA recalls during their lifespans, and no less than 765 post-market modifications were recorded. 3 Twenty-two percent of these post-market

Open access
Anne Lübbeke Division of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by Anne Lübbeke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Christophe Combescure Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Christophe Combescure in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Christophe Barea Division of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Christophe Barea in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Amanda Inez Gonzalez Division of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Amanda Inez Gonzalez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Keith Tucker Chair Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel, UK

Search for other papers by Keith Tucker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Per Kjærsgaard-Andersen Center for Adult Hip and Knee Reconstruction, Department of Orthopaedics, South Danish University, Vejle Hospital, Denmark

Search for other papers by Per Kjærsgaard-Andersen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tom Melvin School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland

Search for other papers by Tom Melvin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alan G Fraser Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK

Search for other papers by Alan G Fraser in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rob Nelissen Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Rob Nelissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
James A Smith Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK
National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by James A Smith in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

. Under the MDR, post-market surveillance is expected to be proactive and continuous, with clinically meaningful comparator(s) and clinically relevant endpoints (risks and benefits). The evidence identified in this review would often not have met those

Open access
Andrew Carr Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by Andrew Carr in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

the increased use of post-market surveillance and intends to fortify the 510(k) system. This falls significantly short of the Institute of Medicine’s recommendation to eliminate the 510(k) route. The US system will improve device recall and will

Open access
Anne Lübbeke Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by Anne Lübbeke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
James A. Smith Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by James A. Smith in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Daniel Prieto-Alhambra Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by Daniel Prieto-Alhambra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Andrew J. Carr Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by Andrew J. Carr in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

difficult to bridge the gap between pre- and post-market assessment and to identify the extent and importance of treatment with implantable devices in the healthcare sector and the problems associated with it. Fragmentation may thus also be one of the

Open access
Alan G. Fraser Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK

Search for other papers by Alan G. Fraser in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rob G.H.H. Nelissen Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Rob G.H.H. Nelissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Per Kjærsgaard-Andersen Department of Orthopaedics, Vejle Hospital, South Danish University, Vejle, Denmark

Search for other papers by Per Kjærsgaard-Andersen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Piotr Szymański Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, MSWiA Central Clinical Hospital, Warsaw, Poland

Search for other papers by Piotr Szymański in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tom Melvin Healthcare Products Regulatory Authority, Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, Ireland

Search for other papers by Tom Melvin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Paul Piscoi Health Technology Unit B6, Directorate General for Health (DG SANTE), European Commission, Brussels, Belgium

Search for other papers by Paul Piscoi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
On behalf of the CORE–MD Investigators (see Appendix) Alan Fraser, Piotr Szymański, Chris Gale, Aldo Maggioni, Elisabetta Zanon, Christina Dimopoulou, Cinzia Ceccarelli, Polyxeni Vairami, Anett Ruszanov, Per Kjærsgaard-Andersen, Rob Nelissen, Adrian Ott, Elizabeth Macintyre, Loredana Simulescu, Marieke Meijer, Berthold Koletzko, Sarah Wieczorek, Adamos Hadjipanayis, Stefano Del Torso, Perla Marang-van de Mheen, Lotje Hoogervorst, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Bas Penning De Vries, Peter McCulloch, Martin Landray, Daniel Prieto Alhambra, James Smith, Anne Lubbeke-Wolf, Stefan James, Sergio Buccheri, Robert Byrne, Laurna McGovern, Stephan Windecker, Andre Frenk, Georgios Siontis, Christoph Stettler, Arjola Bano, Lia Bally, Frank E. Rademakers, Jan D‘hooge, Anton Vedder, Elisabetta Biasin, Erik Kamenjasevic, Petra Schnell-Inderst, Felicitas Kühne, Ola Rolfson, Joel Jakobsson, Amanda Tornsö, Enrico G. Caiani, Lorenzo Gianquintieri, Cinzia Cappiello, Maristella Matera, Tom Melvin, Niall MacAleenan, Ria Mahon, Michèle Meagher, Gearóid McGauran, Thomas Wejs Møller, Ann-Sofie Sonne Holm-Schou, Jan Szulc, Robert E. Geertsma, Jantine W.P.M. van Baal, Joëlle M. Hoebert, Susana L.F. Cabaço, Paola Laricchiuta, Marina Torre, Filippo Boniforti, Eugenio Carrani, Stefania Ceccarelli, Claudia Wild, Sabine Ettinger, Juan Antonio Blasco Amaro, Juan Carlos Rejón Parrilla, Agnieszka Dobrzynska, David Epstein, Valentina Strammiello, Hannes Jarke, Kaisa Immonen, Françoise Schlemmer, Sabina Hoekstra, Marianna Mastroroberto, Christoph Ziskoven, Michael Hahn, Erman Melikyan, Richard Holborow, Suzanne Halliday, Alexey Shiryaev, Gero Viola, Harry van Vugt

Search for other papers by On behalf of the CORE–MD Investigators (see Appendix) in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

important difference; and what follow-up intervals would be recommended for assessing PROMs for specific interventions. A systematic review will assess how PROMs have been used in trials and studies for regulatory purposes and post-market surveillance, and

Open access
Søren Overgaard Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for other papers by Søren Overgaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Thomas M Grupp Aesculap AG Research & Development & Medical Scientific Affairs, Tuttlingen, Germany
Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany

Search for other papers by Thomas M Grupp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rob GHH Nelissen Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
Technical University Delft, Delft, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Rob GHH Nelissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Luca Cristofolini Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Engineering and Architecture, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Search for other papers by Luca Cristofolini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Anne Lübbeke Division of Surgery and Traumatology, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by Anne Lübbeke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Marcus Jäger Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery St. Marien Hospital Mülheim an der Ruhr & Chair of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery University of Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany

Search for other papers by Marcus Jäger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Matthias Fink TÜV Süd Product Service GmbH, Clinical Centre of Excellence, Munich Germany

Search for other papers by Matthias Fink in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sabine Rusch Aesculap AG Research & Development & Medical Scientific Affairs, Tuttlingen, Germany

Search for other papers by Sabine Rusch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hassan Achakri Zimmer Biomet, Clinical, Regulatory & Quality Affairs, Winterthur, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Hassan Achakri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Francesco Benazzo IUSS Pavia, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy

Search for other papers by Francesco Benazzo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dario Bergadano Medacta International SA, Medical Affairs, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Dario Bergadano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Georg N Duda Julius Wolff Institute and Center for Muskuloskeletal Surgery, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Georg N Duda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Christian Kaddick EndoLab Mechanical Engineering GmbH, Riedering, Germany

Search for other papers by Christian Kaddick in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Volkmar Jansson Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany

Search for other papers by Volkmar Jansson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Klaus-Peter Günther University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, Center for Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany

Search for other papers by Klaus-Peter Günther in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

unexpected detected failures. Detected failure modes Typical scenarios (exemplary) Early failure modes in pre‐market setting Fatigue failure of implants Liner wear Late failures in the post‐market setting Excessive

Open access