Search for other papers by Andrea Ferrera in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Jacques Menetrey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction The history of osteotomies starts in the 16th century, but the real development of these techniques has improved between the 19th and 21st centuries, to become the gold standard treatment for the unicompartmental osteoarthritis of
Search for other papers by Andrea Pratobevera in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Luxembourg Institute of Research in Orthopaedics, Sports Medicine and Science (LIROMS), Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Luxembourg-Clinique d’Eich, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Search for other papers by Romain Seil in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Orthopaedic Surgery Service, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Jacques Menetrey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Knee osteotomy, a surgical procedure designed for the correction of bone deformities, has been in use for centuries. Following the introduction and exponential development of arthroplasty surgery, this practice lost interest
Search for other papers by Kamil Cagri Kose in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Omer Bozduman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ali Erkan Yenigul in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Servet Igrek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
/instrumentation and neuro-monitorisation supported with improved anaesthetic care, osteotomy techniques have evolved. Spinal osteotomies are generally needed when the deformity is not correctable with the use of instrumentation alone or when facet or ligament
Search for other papers by Kavin Sundaram in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ahmed Siddiqi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Atul F. Kamath in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carlos A. Higuera-Rueda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background Trochanteric osteotomy is a technique that allows expanded exposure and access to the femoral canal and acetabulum for a number of indications. Charnley strongly advocated for performance of a standard trochanter osteotomy during
Search for other papers by K Venkatadass in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by V Durga Prasad in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nasser Mohammed Mansor Al Ahmadi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S Rajasekaran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
far as the acetabular side procedures are concerned, ambiguity still exists regarding the remodeling capacity of acetabulum, ideal age for pelvic osteotomy (PO), type of PO, safety and long-term radiological and clinical outcomes of each type of
Search for other papers by Gareth G. Jones in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Jaere in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Susannah Clarke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Justin Cobb in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is typically used to treat early isolated medial tibiofemoral compartment osteoarthritis in younger, and physically active, patients for whom knee arthroplasty is associated with higher revision rates
Search for other papers by Jonathan G. Robin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Neyret in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The use of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in Orthopaedic surgery has been well documented in the literature for many years. In general, this procedure has been performed in the setting of symptomatic unicompartmental arthrosis associated with coronal
Search for other papers by Felix Christoph Finger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Osteotomie Komitee der Deutschen Knie Gesellschaft (DKG), Munich, Germany
Search for other papers by Steffen Schröter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christoph Ihle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Moritz Herbst in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tina Histing in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Osteotomie Komitee der Deutschen Knie Gesellschaft (DKG), Munich, Germany
AO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Marc-Daniel Ahrend in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Patients expectations on the postoperative outcome after knee osteotomy are high, especially with regard to pain reduction, regaining knee functionality and return to work ( 1 ). The postoperative period contributes essentially to
Institut du mouvement et de l’appareil locomoteur, Marseille, France
Search for other papers by Ahmed Mabrouk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jae-Sung An in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kristian Kley in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Komal Tapasvi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sachin Tapasvi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matthieu Ollivier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
cases ( 2 ). Isolated high tibial osteotomy yields good midterm results but demonstrates clinical and radiographic deterioration in the long term ( 3 , 4 , 5 ). Cartilage treatment procedures have reported good outcomes. However, the presence of
Search for other papers by Bülent Atilla in
Google Scholar
PubMed
deficient anterior acetabular wall. 3 Fig. 1 A 21-year-old female patient with right hip dysplasia. She had had a previous subtrochanteric femoral valgus support osteotomy at the age of 14 years. Dysplasia is never confined to the hip joint alone
