Search for other papers by Alexei Buruian in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francisco Silva Gomes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tiago Roseiro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Claudia Vale in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by André Carvalho in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Emanuel Seiça in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antonio Mendes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carlos Pereira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, morbid obesity, metastatic lesions, or suspected femoral pathology). 17 – 21 Different nails have been manufactured, although in a recent review no superiority was found for any model. 22 , 23 Distal locking provides length and rotational
Search for other papers by Nuri Aydin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mahmut Enes Kayaalp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mustafa Asansu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bedri Karaismailoglu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
findings and this results as a posteriorly locked humeral head. Due to the low number of the patients with locked posterior shoulder dislocations, there is not a large patient cohort and it is not possible to conclude an evidence-based treatment strategy
Search for other papers by Ozgur Basal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Recep Dincer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bulent Turk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder (LPDS) is an uncommon condition that is often misdiagnosed and becomes chronic due to an inadequate physical examination. LPDS cases include actual fracture-dislocations, impression
AO Research Institute Davos, Switzerland
Search for other papers by James W.A. Fletcher in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Trauma Surgery, Trauma Center Murnau, Germany
Search for other papers by Lisa Wenzel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Verena Neumann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R. Geoff Richards in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Boyko Gueorguiev in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Harinderjit S. Gill in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ezio Preatoni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, UK
Search for other papers by Michael R. Whitehouse in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background The quality and efficacy of orthopaedic fixation relies on screw design and material, bone characteristics and surgical techniques. Traditional fixation methods using non-locking screws, to generate compression and stability, remain
Search for other papers by Lorenzo Massimo Oldrini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pietro Feltri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jacopo Albanese in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Surgical Department - Hand Surgery Unit EOC, Locarno's Regional Hospital, Locarno, Switzerland
Locarno Hand Center, Locarno, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Stefano Lucchina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Giuseppe Filardo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Christian Candrian in
Google Scholar
PubMed
reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with volar locking plate (VLP) ( 10 , 11 ). Each treatment has pros and cons: cast treatment requires longer recovery time and offers a less perfect radiological reduction of the fracture, but it is safer and more
Search for other papers by Karl Stoffel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christoph Sommer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mark Lee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tracy Y Zhu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Karsten Schwieger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christopher Finkemeier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
over 60 years old ( 3 ). Retrograde intramedullary nail (rIMN) and lateral locking compression plate (LCP) are common surgical treatments for distal femoral fractures. Healing difficulties following locking plate are not uncommon. Rates of non-union are
Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Martin Riegger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nermine Habib in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Enrique Adrian Testa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Jochen Müller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marco Guidi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Christian Candrian in
Google Scholar
PubMed
20% ( 7 ). Accordingly, in the past two decades, several implants and surgical techniques have been introduced ( 8 ), as shown in Figs. 2 , 3, and 4 . These include locking plates in a medial, plantar, and dorsal position (Figs. 2A, B, and C
Search for other papers by Olga D. Savvidou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Frantzeska Zampeli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Panagiotis Koutsouradis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by George D. Chloros in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aggelos Kaspiris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Savas Sourmelis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Panayiotis J. Papagelopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
locking plates, orthogonal plates (90°:90°), or parallel plates (medial and lateral supracondylar ridges) are currently the most popular choices of treatment for distal humerus fractures. 6 However, despite evolution of ORIF techniques for distal
Search for other papers by Elena Gálvez-Sirvent in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aitor Ibarzábal-Gil in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
nonunion (78.8%). Most were locked IM nails; a distal locking screw was not implanted in four patients. Bone healing was achieved in 31 patients (93.9%). In one patient, a nail change was required to achieve bone healing, and in another patient an infection
Search for other papers by Jan Bartoníček in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefan Rammelt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michal Tuček in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Bosworth fracture (BF) is a special type of locked ankle fracture-dislocation, characterized by displacement of a fragment of the fractured fibula from the fibular notch (FN) behind the posterior surface of the distal tibia ( Fig