Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 5 of 5 items for :

  • intraoperative cement extravasation x
Clear All
Marko Nabergoj Valdoltra Orthopaedic Hospital, Ankaran, Slovenia
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Search for other papers by Marko Nabergoj in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Patrick J. Denard Oregon Shoulder Institute, Medford, OR

Search for other papers by Patrick J. Denard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Philippe Collin Centre Hospitalier Privé Saint-Grégoire (Vivalto Santé), Saint- Grégoire, France

Search for other papers by Philippe Collin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rihard Trebše Valdoltra Orthopaedic Hospital, Ankaran, Slovenia
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Search for other papers by Rihard Trebše in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Alexandre Lädermann Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, La Tour Hospital
Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Alexandre Lädermann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

right B3 glenoid. Observe the proximity of the rib cage despite the patient’s musculature. Source : From wiki.beemed.com , with permission. Intraoperative cement extravasation Cement extrusion has been an unusual complication after RSA

Open access
Raul Barco Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by Raul Barco in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Olga D. Savvidou Athens University Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece

Search for other papers by Olga D. Savvidou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
John W. Sperling Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA

Search for other papers by John W. Sperling in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Joaquín Sanchez-Sotelo Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA

Search for other papers by Joaquín Sanchez-Sotelo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Robert H. Cofield Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA

Search for other papers by Robert H. Cofield in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

‘problem’ to refer to those events perceived as adverse, but unlikely to affect the final outcome (notching, hematoma, heterotopic ossification, algodystrophy, intra-operative fracture, cement extravasation or glenoid lucent lines). Some of these decisions

Open access
Marko Nabergoj Valdoltra Orthopaedic Hospital, Ankaran, Slovenia
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Search for other papers by Marko Nabergoj in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Patrick J. Denard Department of Orthopaedic & Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA

Search for other papers by Patrick J. Denard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Philippe Collin Centre Hospitalier Privé Saint-Grégoire (Vivalto Santé), Saint-Grégoire, France

Search for other papers by Philippe Collin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rihard Trebše Valdoltra Orthopaedic Hospital, Ankaran, Slovenia
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Search for other papers by Rihard Trebše in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Alexandre Lädermann Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, La Tour Hospital, Meyrin, Switzerland
Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Alexandre Lädermann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

include scapular notching, haematomas, heterotopic ossification, complex regional pain syndrome, phlebitis, intraoperative dislocations, intraoperative cement extravasation, or radiographic lucent lines of the glenoid. 19 Prevalence and risk factors

Open access
Philippe Hernigou Hôpital Henri Mondor, University Paris East, Paris, France

Search for other papers by Philippe Hernigou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Victor Housset Hôpital Henri Mondor, University Paris East, Paris, France

Search for other papers by Victor Housset in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jacques Pariat Hôpital Henri Mondor, University Paris East, Paris, France

Search for other papers by Jacques Pariat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Arnaud Dubory Hôpital Henri Mondor, University Paris East, Paris, France

Search for other papers by Arnaud Dubory in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette Hôpital Henri Mondor, University Paris East, Paris, France

Search for other papers by Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

the choice is a cemented implant. After the operation, the antibiotics are continued for three days if intraoperative cultures were negative and for one month if the cultures or histological examination were positive. No empirical coverage of

Open access
Fabio D’Angelo Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, ASST Sette Laghi, Department of Biotechnologies and Life Sciences (DBSV), Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, Varese, Italy

Search for other papers by Fabio D’Angelo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Luca Monestier Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy

Search for other papers by Luca Monestier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Luigi Zagra IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Hip Department, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Luigi Zagra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

partial pain relief. Although modified over the years, Girdlestone’s procedure remains a viable option for treating septic arthritis of the adult hip in selected patients. Recent advances in treatment include antibiotic-loaded cement spacers, total hip

Open access