Search for other papers by Olga D. Savvidou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Frantzeska Zampeli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Panagiotis Koutsouradis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by George D. Chloros in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aggelos Kaspiris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Savas Sourmelis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Panayiotis J. Papagelopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction The management of distal humerus fractures is considered challenging and technically demanding, because of the complexity of the regional anatomy and the multifragmentary pattern of injury. Distal humerus fractures in adults have
Search for other papers by Frédéric Vauclair in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Patrick Goetti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ngoc Tram V. Nguyen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Distal humerus fractures are relatively uncommon injuries, accounting for approximately 2% of all fractures. 1 The overall incidence in adults is 5.7 cases per 100,000 per year. 1 – 3 Similar to other extremity fractures
Search for other papers by Alfonso Vaquero-Picado in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gaspar González-Morán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luis Moraleda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Supracondylar fractures of the humerus are the most frequent fractures affecting the paediatric elbow 1 and their correct management is important because they can cause catastrophic complications. Despite there being a clear
Search for other papers by Arnaud Godenèche in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jérôme Garret in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johannes Barth in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aude Michelet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laurent Geais in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shoulder Friends Institute in
Google Scholar
PubMed
’ OR ‘anatomic shoulder arthroplasty’ OR ‘anatomic shoulder replacement’) AND (‘humeral’ OR ‘humeri’ OR ‘humerus’) AND (‘implant’ OR ‘component’ OR ‘stem’) AND (‘revision’ OR ‘revised’ OR ‘stress shielding’ OR ‘stress-shielding’ OR ‘loosening’ OR
Search for other papers by Lorenzo Massimo Oldrini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alessandro Sangiorgio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pietro Feltri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francesco Marbach in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Giuseppe Filardo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Christian Candrian in
Google Scholar
PubMed
the axillary nerve, which may suffer iatrogenic injury. In addition, exposure of the medial aspects of the proximal humerus is limited, and anatomical reduction of fractures with more than two parts may be more difficult ( 20 ). Accordingly, open
Search for other papers by Patrick Goetti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Patrick J. Denard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Collin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mohamed Ibrahim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pierre Hoffmeyer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Alexandre Lädermann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
present in isolation in 51% of cases. 40 They are, however, sufficient to increase posterior translation and inferior translation of the humerus in the sulcus position by 86% and 31% respectively. 41 Additionally, glenoid retroversion is more
Search for other papers by Laurent Nové-Josserand in
Google Scholar
PubMed
transdeltoid approach because of the existing rotator cuff tear or fracture. Second: resection of the humeral head to approach the glenoid and open the surgical space. Third: reclining the humerus to allow a frontal approach to the glenoid cavity. In the
Search for other papers by Simon M. Lambert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
’ tolerance of malunion at the completion of healing. Clinicians who advocate surgical intervention to restore the shape of the proximal humerus, with the intention of restoration of the centre of rotation of the glenohumeral joint for optimal deltoid function
Search for other papers by Elisa Pala in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alberto Procura in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Giulia Trovarelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antonio Berizzi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pietro Ruggieri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
34 Humerus 8 7 15 Tibia 2 1 3 Pathological fracture Actual 16 15 31 Impending 11 10 21 The long bone treated with IM nailing was the femur (34 cases), followed by the humerus
Search for other papers by Maciej Otworowski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dariusz Grzelecki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Krzysztof Starszak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrzej Boszczyk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mateusz Piorunek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Trauma and Orthopedics Department, Centre of Posgraduate Medical Education, Otwock, Poland
Search for other papers by Bartłomiej Kordasiewicz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
humerus were the 14th most common complication (1.3%), postoperative fractures were 17th (1%), and glenoid fractures were 19th ( 6 ). The general rate of periprosthetic fracture in the studies included in this review was as follows: 0–10% in TSA, 0
