Search for other papers by Martin McNally in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Geertje Govaert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maria Dudareva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mario Morgenstern in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Willem-Jan Metsemakers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
be confusing and do not give specific indication of the relationship with a fracture. The FRI Consensus Group published the initial definition criteria in 2018 8 and the term ‘fracture-related infection’ was adopted to encompass all infections
King’s Global Health Partnerships, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
Search for other papers by Elizabeth K Tissingh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Leonard Marais in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antonio Loro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Deepa Bose in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nilo T Paner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedics, University of the Philippines, Philippine General Hospital Manila, The Phillipines
Search for other papers by Jamie Ferguson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mario Morgensten in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin McNally in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction and aims The global burden of fracture-related infection (FRI) is likely to be concentrated in countries with limited healthcare resources. Conditions associated with FRI (road injuries, other musculoskeletal disorders, falls and
Porto Bone and Joint Infection Group (GRIP), Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto and Grupo TrofaSaude, Portugal
Search for other papers by Ricardo Sousa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by André Carvalho in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Microbiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
Search for other papers by Ana Cláudia Santos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Microbiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
Search for other papers by Miguel Araújo Abreu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
best practices for obtaining adequate samples in the most frequent clinical scenarios: (a) native and prosthetic joint infections; (b) osteomyelitis and fracture-related infections; (c) spinal infections and; (d) diabetic foot infections. Although a
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
Centre de Références des IOA Complexes de Lyon, CRIOAc Lyon, Lyon, France
StaPath team, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, CIRI, Inserm U1111, CNRS UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, UCBL1, Lyon, France
Education and Clinical Officer of the ESCMID Study Group for Non-traditional Antibacterial Therapy (ESGNTA)
Search for other papers by Tristan Ferry in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Oude Markt 13, Leuven, Belgium
Search for other papers by Jolien Onsea in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tiphaine Roussel-Gaillard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cécile Batailler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thomas Fintan Moriarty in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Oude Markt 13, Leuven, Belgium
Search for other papers by Willem-Jan Metsemakers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Musculoskeletal infections (MSIs), including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and fracture-related infection (FRI), remain a devastating complication in modern trauma and orthopaedic surgery, with significant financial and
Center of Orthopaedics and Regenerative Medicine (C.O.RE.) – Center of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (C.I.R.I.) – Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Balkan Center, Hellas, Greece
Hôpital de la Tour, Geneva, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Eustathios Kenanidis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Konstantinos Kapriniotis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Panagiotis Anagnostis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center of Orthopaedics and Regenerative Medicine (C.O.RE.) – Center of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (C.I.R.I.) – Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Balkan Center, Hellas, Greece
Search for other papers by Michael Potoupnis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Panayiotis Christofilopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center of Orthopaedics and Regenerative Medicine (C.O.RE.) – Center of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (C.I.R.I.) – Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Balkan Center, Hellas, Greece
Search for other papers by Eleftherios Tsiridis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
head, osteoporosis, pathological fractures and infections, namely septic arthritis and osteomyelitis. 2 , 5 Bony deformities such as marrow hyperplasia, thinning of trabeculae and cortices, as well as sclerotic areas that obliterate the femoral
Osteoarticular Surgery Research, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research – IdiPAZ (La Paz University Hospital – Autonomous University of Madrid), Madrid, Spain
Search for other papers by E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carlos Kalbakdij-Sánchez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, we should attempt to avoid them whenever possible to minimise the risk of complications after primary TKA implantation. A PubMed (MEDLINE) and Cochrane Library search of studies related to PD in TKA was analysed. The keywords used were ‘Parkinson
Search for other papers by Piti Rattanaprichavej in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Patapong Towiwat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Artit Laoruengthana in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
Search for other papers by Piyameth Dilokthornsakul in
Google Scholar
PubMed
School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Search for other papers by Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
the most common complication (24.0%), followed by periprosthetic fracture (PPFx) (17.4%), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (13.0%), aseptic loosening (10.9%), and ligament injury (10.9%). Other complications (13.0%) such as flexion contracture
Search for other papers by Maria Anna Smolle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lukas Leitner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nikolaus Böhler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Franz-Josef Seibert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mathias Glehr in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andreas Leithner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
review and meta-analysis was to comprehensively analyse the potential negative effect of smoking on fracture risk, nonunion risk after elective orthopaedic procedures and fracture surgery in general, postoperative infection risk after trauma and
Search for other papers by Salvi Prat-Fabregat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pilar Camacho-Carrasco in
Google Scholar
PubMed
answered. They are discussed in detail below. Is it a high- or a low-energy trauma? Both high- and low-energy trauma can cause TPFs. Usually complex knee fractures are seen in pedestrians struck by vehicles and also in work-related accidents. 1
Search for other papers by Ian Garrison in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Grayson Domingue in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M. Wesley Honeycutt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
time, rate of infection, rate of refracture, and rate of nonunion. Horner et al 18 Prospective study 644 Subtrochanteric and Intertrochanteric femur fracture; implant-related complications and mortality Implant-related complication 9