Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Martin Riegger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nermine Habib in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Enrique Adrian Testa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Jochen Müller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marco Guidi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Christian Candrian in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-union. In this light, evidence-based data could guide surgeons in understanding the biomechanical properties of the different options to choose the most suitable implant and provide the best fixation strategy. Figure 1 Classic crossed screw fixation
Search for other papers by Wout Füssenich in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Hospital for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery Pius-Hospital, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
Search for other papers by Gesine H Seeber in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julian R Zwoferink in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matthijs P Somford in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Stevens in
Google Scholar
PubMed
.2) Joint fixation Plate + screw 285 277 (97.2) 8 (2.8) Crossplate compression screw 16 14 (87.5) 2 (12.5) Crossed screws 415 369 (88.9) 46 (11.1) Plate 199 186 (93.5) 13 (6.5) Other* 19 16
Search for other papers by Maciej Otworowski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dariusz Grzelecki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Krzysztof Starszak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrzej Boszczyk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mateusz Piorunek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Trauma and Orthopedics Department, Centre of Posgraduate Medical Education, Otwock, Poland
Search for other papers by Bartłomiej Kordasiewicz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
options. Methodology Methodology of this systematic review was designed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations ( 41 ). Two authors cross-checked the PubMed and Web of Science
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Unit, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM), Canada.
Search for other papers by Amer Sebaaly in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maroun Rizkallah in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Guillaume Riouallon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zhi Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pierre Emmanuel Moreau in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Falah Bachour in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ghassan Maalouf in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. Dick JC Jones MP Zdeblick TA Kunz DN Horton WC . A biomechanical comparison evaluating the use of intermediate screws and cross-linkage in lumbar pedicle fixation . J Spinal Disord 1994 ; 7 : 402 - 407 . 53
Search for other papers by Christos Garnavos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
eccentric trajectory. (f) As the guide wire crosses the pathway of the ‘blocking’ screw, it is withdrawn (but not removed from the distal segment) and the ‘blocking’ screw is inserted antero-posteriorly, at a position (g) (h) that will allow both the
Search for other papers by Horacio Caviglia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Adrian Mejail in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maria Eulalia Landro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nosratolah Vatani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
intramedullary fixation of the ilium, ischium and pubic bones and clearly identified the respective bone corridors where screws must be placed. Subsequently, the results of clinical applications of this technique were presented. 32 , 33 The approach for
Search for other papers by Jorge de-las-Heras Romero in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ana María Lledó Alvarez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fernando Moreno Sanchez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alejandro Perez Garcia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pedro Antonio Garcia Porcel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Raul Valverde Sarabia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marina Hernandez Torralba in
Google Scholar
PubMed
operatively. 2 The goals of surgery are reduction and maintenance of the structures in their correct position so that the ligaments can heal properly. 12 This is achieved by syndesmotic screw fixation, suture-button dynamic fixation or repair of the
Search for other papers by Lukas Fraissler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christian Konrads in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maik Hoberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maximilian Rudert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matthias Walcher in
Google Scholar
PubMed
first TMT joint are described in the literature: screw fixation with different screw positions, two crossed screws through the first TMT joint in most of the studies, staple fixation, external fixation, as well as dorso-medial, medial and plantar locking
Search for other papers by Alpaslan Senkoylu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mehmet Cetinkaya in
Google Scholar
PubMed
: 1598 - 1604 . 5 Suk SI , Lee CK , Kim WJ , Chung YJ , Park YB . Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis . Spine 1995 ; 20 : 1399 - 1405 . 6 Rho
Anatomy Institute and Orthopedics Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Search for other papers by Diogo Lino Moura in
Google Scholar
PubMed
JC Jones MP Zdeblick TA Kunz DN & Horton WC . A biomechanical comparison evaluating the use of intermediate screws and cross-linkage in lumbar pedicle fixation . Journal of Spinal Disorders 1994 7 402 – 407 . ( https://doi.org/10
