Search for other papers by Wen-xi Sun in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wei-qiang Huang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hua-yang Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hong-shen Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sheng-li Guo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jie Dong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bo-lai Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yong-peng Lin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
.76%) Cerebrospinal fluid leak 1 (0.13%) 3 (0.38%) Decreased muscle strength 1 (0.13%) 1 (0.13%) Dural injury 0 1 (0.13%) Total 38 (4.83%) 119 (14.97%) FH, freehand; RA, robot assisted. Clinical efficacy
Search for other papers by Guo-xu Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ji Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Qi-jun Xie in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mei-ren Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kui Zhao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hai-yun Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
primarily employs meta-analysis to compare the clinical efficacy and postoperative complications of two surgical methods for treating comminuted fractures of the distal femur. Materials and methods This meta-analysis was performed according to the
Search for other papers by Wen-xi Sun in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hao-nan Liu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Meng-tong Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yong-peng Lin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hong-shen Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Spine Center, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
Search for other papers by Bo-lai Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
increasingly recognized by orthopaedic surgeons. They have gradually become widely used clinical procedures. However, there is still debate as to which of these two techniques is more advantageous ( 6 ). A meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
Centre de Références des IOA Complexes de Lyon, CRIOAc Lyon, Lyon, France
StaPath team, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, CIRI, Inserm U1111, CNRS UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, UCBL1, Lyon, France
Education and Clinical Officer of the ESCMID Study Group for Non-traditional Antibacterial Therapy (ESGNTA)
Search for other papers by Tristan Ferry in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Oude Markt 13, Leuven, Belgium
Search for other papers by Jolien Onsea in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tiphaine Roussel-Gaillard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cécile Batailler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thomas Fintan Moriarty in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Oude Markt 13, Leuven, Belgium
Search for other papers by Willem-Jan Metsemakers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, administration protocols and phage selection. Future perspectives entail addressing regulatory barriers, standardising treatment protocols and conducting high-quality clinical trials to establish phage therapy’s efficacy for the treatment of MSIs. ICMJE
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for other papers by Hsiao-Yi Cheng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Primary Care Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for other papers by Chun-Wei Liang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for other papers by Yu-Hao Lee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Timporn Vitoonpong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Master’s Program in Long-Term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for other papers by Chun-De Liao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for other papers by Shih-Wei Huang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
corticosteroids exhibited an efficacy similar to that of exercise alone. We found no clinical trials on the effects of stromal vascular fractions combined with exercise and thus could not evaluate the effects of stromal vascular fractions in the present study
Search for other papers by Alan G. Fraser in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rob G.H.H. Nelissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Per Kjærsgaard-Andersen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Piotr Szymański in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tom Melvin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paul Piscoi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by On behalf of the CORE–MD Investigators (see Appendix) in
Google Scholar
PubMed
clinical evidence generation after market access Methods used to generate clinical evidence for high-risk medical devices Methods used to evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of devices and to monitor their performance should be
Search for other papers by Enrique Gómez-Barrena in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Norma G. Padilla-Eguiluz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Rosset in
Google Scholar
PubMed
painful delayed union as a non-union. 2 However, and despite the general belief, the most commonly used definition of a non-union in clinical trials today was proposed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA): ‘A non-union occurs when fracture
Search for other papers by Thomas Collins in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dinesh Alexander in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bilal Barkatali in
Google Scholar
PubMed
compared to corticosteroid, were those documenting L-PRP was used. Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies assessing PRP efficacy in Achilles tendinopathy 53 showed that PRP conferred no clinical benefit when compared to saline placebo or an
Search for other papers by Abdus S. Burahee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrew D. Sanders in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Colin Shirley in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dominic M. Power in
Google Scholar
PubMed
CuTS has not been demonstrated. Different techniques are selected for different clinical situations with SD being the most common procedure due to its good efficacy and low complication rate. 35 – 38 Simple decompression SD is performed with a
Search for other papers by Silvia Valisena in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Benjamin Azogui in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rémy S Nizard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe M Tscholl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Etienne Cavaignac in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pierre-Alban Bouché in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Didier Hannouche in
Google Scholar
PubMed
which treatment has the best efficacy and safety profile since they compare only two techniques each ( 20 ). This necessitates the summary of evidence with network meta-analyses (NMA) that, by allowing the comparison of multiple treatments, bypass the