Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, IBHGC-Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak, HESAM Université, Paris, France
Search for other papers by Xavier du Cluzel de Remaurin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nejib Khouri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Samuel Georges in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laurent Gajny in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Claudio Vergari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alina Badina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
should be considered in relation to the femoral head: this is even more important as the patient-reported outcomes tend to improve with better radiologic correction of femoral head coverage and acetabular orientation ( 21 ). This also reduces
Search for other papers by Geert Meermans in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by George Grammatopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Moritz Innmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David Beverland in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Acetabular component orientation and position are important factors in the short- and long-term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, it is crucial that the surgeon has accurate and precise control over the
South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, UK
Search for other papers by Charles Rivière in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefan Lazic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Louis Dagneaux in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Catherine Van Der Straeten in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Justin Cobb in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sarah Muirhead-Allwood in
Google Scholar
PubMed
secondary to aberrant standing functional acetabular orientation, under-coverage of the femoral head anteriorly and posterior impingement. 17 , 18 With THA, implants would therefore be at a higher risk of failure, notably through complications related
Search for other papers by Javier Pizones in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eduardo García-Rey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
found in the hip joint as a consequence of these phenomena. First, pelvic sagittal rotation directly affects functional acetabular orientation. Pelvic retroversion (posterior pelvic tilt – increased PT) would increase the functional anteversion and the
Search for other papers by Charles Rivière in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefan Lazic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Loïc Villet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yann Wiart in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sarah Muirhead Allwood in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Justin Cobb in
Google Scholar
PubMed
° anteversion (Lewinnek box) relative to the anterior pelvic plane (Lewinnek plane), as this was shown to reduce the risk of prosthetic dislocation. 6 Because the native acetabular orientation varies in the population, 20 , 21 a similar prosthetic
Search for other papers by George Grammatopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Moritz Innmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Phan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Russell Bodner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Geert Meermans in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Appropriate component orientation is important for success following hip arthroplasty ( 1 ). The significance of appropriate acetabular component (cup) orientation was further highlighted with the use of the third-generation metal
Search for other papers by Lisa Renner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Viktor Janz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carsten Perka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Georgi I. Wassilew in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. References 1 Biedermann R , Tonin A , Krismer M , et al. . Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component . J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005 ; 87-B : 762 - 9
Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Portugal
Search for other papers by Bruno Direito-Santos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Guilherme França in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jóni Nunes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by André Costa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eurico Bandeira Rodrigues in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A. Pedro Silva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Portugal
Search for other papers by Pedro Varanda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
(acetabular retroversion: AR). 9 Changes in acetabular orientation and failure to recognize them may have implications for the final FAI treatment outcome. 10 Moreover, acetabular orientation anomalies could coexist with other important deformities
Search for other papers by Dominic Davenport in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Venu Kavarthapu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
treating early dislocation following hip arthroplasty . Hip Int 2012 ; 22 : 62 - 67 . 4 Kennedy JG , Rogers WB , Soffe KE , et al. . Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic
Search for other papers by George C. Babis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vasileios S. Nikolaou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
allograft. A cemented liner is then cemented in the cage or ring in the proper orientation. The Ganz reinforcement ring (Sulzer Medica, Winterthur, Switzerland) was designed to reinforce the anterior and posterior walls, the acetabular dome, and the
