TraumaEvidence @ German Society for Trauma Surgery, Berlin, Germany
Search for other papers by Martin C Jordan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Konrad F Fuchs in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Steven C Herath in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Search for other papers by Joachim Windolf in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rainer H Meffert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Search for other papers by Anne Neubert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
type II (APC II) injuries show symphysis widening and rupture of the anterior sacroiliac complex. These injuries can be treated with anterior plate fixation (SP fixation) alone or in combination with an additional posterior sacroiliac screw (SP
Firoozgar Hospital, Bone and Joint reconstruction research center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Orthopedic, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Search for other papers by Arvin Eslami in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopedic, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Search for other papers by Mohammadreza Chehrassan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Firoozgar Hospital, Bone and Joint reconstruction research center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Orthopedic, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Search for other papers by Shaya Alimoghadam in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Firoozgar Hospital, Bone and Joint reconstruction research center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Orthopedic, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Search for other papers by Karim Pisoudeh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Amir Kasaeian in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Firoozgar Hospital, Bone and Joint reconstruction research center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Orthopedic, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Search for other papers by Omid Elahifar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
.1%) 9 (52.9%) 17 (100%) Pelvic ring fracture type LC-I 7 (100%) 0 (0.0%) 6 (85.7%) 1 (14.3%) 7 (100%) APC-I 1 (100%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (100%) 1 (100%) APC-II 6 (85.7%) 1 (14.3%) 4 (57
Search for other papers by Juan Ramón Cano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by José Manuel Bogallo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alicia Ramirez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Enrique Guerado in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. APC II: rotationally unstable, vertically stable. Pubic diastasis >2.5 cm, anterior disruption of sacroiliac ligaments, and diastasis of the anterior part of the sacroiliac joint, with intact posterior sacroiliac ligaments; long ligaments are disrupted
Search for other papers by Dongmei Wu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rohan M Bhalekar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jordan S Marsh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David J Langton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alan J Stewart in
Google Scholar
PubMed
follow-up 0.45 ± 0.37 0.31 ± 0.15 Savarino et al. (113) Serum Group I – Stable TKRs ( n = 24) (CoCr (Fem+ Tib) = 7; CoCr (Fem) and Ti (Tib)=17); group II – Failed TKRs ( n = 35) (CoCr (Fem + Tib) = 15;CoCr (Fem) and Ti (Tib): 20) 59
Search for other papers by Pedro Cano-Luís in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Miguel Ángel Giráldez-Sánchez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pablo Andrés-Cano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Anterior arthrodesis Type II Posterior No No Yes Posterior osteosynthesis/arthrodesis Type III Anterior and posterior No No Yes Sequential 2/3-stage 1 operation Complex instability Yes Type IA Anterior
Academic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, LGI, University of Leeds, UK
Search for other papers by Emmanuele Santolini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nikolaos K. Kanakaris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Center, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
Search for other papers by Peter V. Giannoudis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, 15 for low-energy fractures. The AO/OTA classification classifies the fracture according to pelvic ring stability, while the YB takes into account the fracture resulting from the different displacing vectors: anterior-posterior compression (APC
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Catalin Cirstoiu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Bogdan Cretu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Bogdan Serban in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Zsombor Panti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Mihai Nica in
Google Scholar
PubMed
resections use bone grafts in the form of: vascularized or non-vascularized autografts; allografts; osteochondral allografts; allograft and endoprosthetic composite (APC); or synthetic bone grafts. Bone autografts can be considered the gold standard for
Search for other papers by Ting-Yu Tu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Occupational Therapy, Shu-Zen Junior College of Medicine and Management, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Department of Biomedical Engineering, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Search for other papers by Chun-Yu Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Search for other papers by Pei-Chin Lin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chih-Yang Hsu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kai-Cheng Lin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
NA ORIF 14 9 5 68.2 (50–83) I: 3; II: 8; III: 3; IV: 0 7 7 7 7 0 aTHA + ORIF 13 8 5 76.5 (64–89) I: 0; II: 6; IIIL: 6; IV: 1 8 5 9 4 0 Carroll et al . ( 23 ) 67 ± 8.3 (56
Search for other papers by Heri Suroto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Benedictus Anindita Satmoko in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tabita Prajasari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Brigita De Vega in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Teddy Heri Wardhana in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Steven K Samijo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
et al. ( 45 ) South Korea CCS III 76 76 36 11 25 40 11 29 61.4 ± 7.8 64.8 ± 5.3 Small to massive medium size full-thickness tear Benedetto et al. ( 43 ) Italy RTC II 33 33 18 11 7 15 7 8