Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 6 of 6 items for :

  • "spinopelvic mobility" x
Clear All

Luigi Zagra, Francesco Benazzo, Dante Dallari, Francesco Falez, Giuseppe Solarino, Rocco D’Apolito, and Claudio Carlo Castelli

position Biomechanical parameters and classifications are heterogeneous; nonetheless, we can find some common ‘fixed-points’ on which to summarize one or more operative strategies ( Table 2 ). Absence of spinal deformities with normal spinopelvic mobility

Geert Meermans, George Grammatopoulos, Moritz Innmann, and David Beverland

studies have demonstrated a significantly higher risk for dislocation in patients with abnormal spinopelvic characteristics ( 25 , 38 , 39 ). Spinopelvic mobility describes the interaction of the lumbar spine, the pelvis and hip joint, whereas these

Rory Cuthbert, James Wong, Philip Mitchell, and Parag Kumar Jaiswal

influence of spinopelvic mobility and the acetabular component inclination and anteversion for THA. 41 , 42 Movement from standing to sitting is accompanied by posterior tilt of the pelvis, thus enabling the acetabulum to open for clearance of the hip

Charles Rivière, Stefan Lazic, Louis Dagneaux, Catherine Van Der Straeten, Justin Cobb, and Sarah Muirhead-Allwood

. Stefl M Lundergan W Heckmann N . Spinopelvic mobility and acetabular component position for total hip arthroplasty . Bone Joint J 2017 ; 99-B ( suppl A ): 37 - 45 . 19. Bedard NA Martin CT Slaven

Charles Rivière, Stefan Lazic, Loïc Villet, Yann Wiart, Sarah Muirhead Allwood, and Justin Cobb

replacement for patients with ankylosing spondylitis . J Arthroplasty 2015 ; 30 : 2219 - 23 . 59. Stefl M Lundergan W Heckmann N . Spinopelvic mobility and acetabular component position for total hip arthroplasty . Bone

Habeeb Bishi, Joshua B V Smith, Vipin Asopa, Richard E Field, Chao Wang, and David H Sochart

hip-spine relationship in total hip arthroplasty . Orthopedic Reviews 2020 12 8656. ( https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8656 ) 33 Haffer H Adl Amini D Perka C Pumberger M . The impact of spinopelvic mobility on arthroplasty: implications for