failure, which is usually solved via revision TKA (rTKA) by addressing the pathologies and consequences resulting from failure. Studies to date have demonstrated a significant increase in the requirement for revision procedures ( 2 , 3 , 4 , 5
Jun Zhang, Erhu Li, and Yuan Zhang
Nicolas Bonnevialle, Florence Dauzères, Julien Toulemonde, Fanny Elia, Jean-Michel Laffosse, and Pierre Mansat
- 29 Cement spacer An antibiotic-loaded cement spacer can be used either permanently or as the first step of a two-stage revision procedure. In this case, it maintains the space and soft-tissue tension for re-implantation and theoretically
Martyn Porter, Richard Armstrong, Peter Howard, Matthew Porteous, and J. Mark Wilkinson
state but the first change since the primary took place. For example, if a patient has died after the revision of a primary procedure, the end state will be reported as ‘Revised’, not ‘Deceased’. There is a similar report for revision procedures. Fig
Jonathan M. R. French, Paul Bramley, Sean Scattergood, and Nemandra A. Sandiford
Introduction Dislocation remains a major challenge following total hip replacement (THR), occurring after 0.5% to 5% of primary and 5% to 30% of revision procedures. 1 – 4 Dual-mobility (DM) constructs are one option for patients deemed
Francesco Smeraglia, Federico Tamborini, Leonardo Garutti, Andrea Minini, Morena A. Basso, and Mario Cherubino
.7–9.0 weeks). Table 3. Number of procedures, complications, revisions and return to sport/work Study Surgical technique N of patients Complications Revision procedure Return to sport\work (weeks) average Zandi 2005 10
Carlos A. Encinas-Ullán, Primitivo Gómez-Cardero, Juan S. Ruiz-Pérez, and E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán
years Case 1: The old 12-mm tibial insert was explanted and replaced with a 21-mm insert Case 2: A revision procedure with another 23-mm tibial insert Case 1: Gave way upon standing up while gardening with the tibial metal post fractured Case 2: by
Christof Berberich and Pablo Sanz-Ruiz
use the same ALBC in revision procedures if it had been already used in previous surgery. Fig. 5 Pellets made of gentamicin-impregnated bone cement (80 mg gentamicin per 20 g cement) were subcutaneously implanted in one group of 22 Sprague Dawley
E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán
revision procedures. The risk of prosthesis loss (odds ratio 5.7) was significantly higher after revision procedures. The findings of this study showed that rotating hinge knee prostheses provided good clinical and functional results in selected cases of
Abdus S. Burahee, Andrew D. Sanders, and Dominic M. Power
require a revision procedure. Risk factors for failure include younger age at presentation, greater static two-point discrimination and history of diabetes. 8 Failed cubital tunnel decompression Failure following any surgical procedure is
Olivier Guyen
instability. 28 , 29 Over the past ten years, the number of clinical reports with the use of modern designs of dual mobility implants both for primary and revision procedures has risen. Most of these studies are observational. In primary procedures, the