Centre for Hip Surgery, Wrightington Hospital, UK
Search for other papers by Martyn Porter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Head of Health Registries, Northgate Public Services, Peoplebuilding 2, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, England
Search for other papers by Richard Armstrong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK
Search for other papers by Peter Howard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, UK
Search for other papers by Matthew Porteous in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
Search for other papers by J. Mark Wilkinson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, 25 appraisal 26 and implant mismatch notification. 27 Stakeholders (including purchasers, regulators, surgeon and hospital representatives and quality improvement teams) have been extensively consulted. For each topic there are a
Search for other papers by Keijo T. Mäkelä in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ove Furnes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Geir Hallan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anne Marie Fenstad in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ola Rolfson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johan Kärrholm in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cecilia Rogmark in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alma Becic Pedersen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Otto Robertsson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Annette W-Dahl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antti Eskelinen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Henrik M. Schrøder in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ville Äärimaa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jeppe V. Rasmussen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Björn Salomonsson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Randi Hole in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Søren Overgaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
compilation of big datasets will contribute to a higher quality of the analyses performed. Another specific aim of NARA is to discuss and agree upon methodology and coordinate quality improvements as regards data capture and analyses. In addition, NARA also
Search for other papers by Ian Wilson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eric Bohm in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anne Lübbeke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stephen Lyman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Søren Overgaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ola Rolfson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Annette W-Dahl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mark Wilkinson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael Dunbar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
patterns). • Support health service allocation decisions (‘value-based care). • Inform quality improvement initiatives. Healthcare organizations • Monitor organization and provider performance. • Conduct comparisons with peer organizations. • Inform
Search for other papers by Colby Foster in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Search for other papers by Christopher Posada in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bryan Pack in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Brian R. Hallstrom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Department of Industrial & Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Michigan, USA
Search for other papers by Richard E. Hughes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
reports financial support for quality improvement collaborative, MARCQI from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan/Blue Care Network, relevant to the submitted work. CP reports financial support for quality improvement collaborative, MARCQI from Blue Cross
Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Peter van Schie in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shaho Hasan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Leti van Bodegom-Vos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jan W Schoones in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rob G H H Nelissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Perla J Marang-van de Mheen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
feedback through annual reports intended to encourage quality improvement initiatives in low-performing hospitals and learn from high-performing hospitals by adopting best practices ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ). In addition, scientific articles
Search for other papers by SaTia T. Sinclair in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ahmed K. Emara in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Melissa N. Orr in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kara M. McConaghy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alison K. Klika in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicolas S. Piuzzi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
summary score? No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Notes . ACS NSQIP, American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; EQ, European Quality of Life; EQ-5D
Search for other papers by John-Henry Rhind in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eamon Ramhamadany in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ruaraidh Collins in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Siddharth Govilkar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Debashis Dass in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stuart Hay in
Google Scholar
PubMed
district hospital setting: a quality improvement approach . BMJ Qual Improv Prog 2017 ; 6 . 22. Holgate J Kirmani S Anand B . Virtual fracture clinic delivers British Orthopaedic Association compliance . Ann R Coll
Search for other papers by E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
were selected from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. A propensity score was used to match 1476 fast-track ( ≤ 2 day length of stay) inpatients with 492 outpatients (3:1 ratio). Thirty
Search for other papers by A Frodl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N Geisteuer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Fuchs in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T Nymark in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Odense, Odense C, Denmark
Search for other papers by H Schmal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
lower extremity amputations using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program public use data . Journal of Vascular Surgery 2013 58 1276 – 1282 . ( https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.05.026 ) 15. Cooper HJ Bas MA . Closed-incision negative
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Search for other papers by Anne Lübbeke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
Search for other papers by James A. Smith in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Daniel Prieto-Alhambra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
Search for other papers by Andrew J. Carr in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Vascular Registries . VASCUNET, VQI, and the International Consortium of Vascular Registries: unique collaborations for quality improvement in vascular surgery . Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2019 ; 58 : 792 – 793 . 11. Rathi VK Ross