Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for :

  • "crossed screw fixation" x
Clear All
Martin Riegger Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland
Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Martin Riegger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Nermine Habib Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hopital fribourgeois (HFR) – Freiburger Spital (HFR), Fribourg, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Nermine Habib in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Enrique Adrian Testa Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Enrique Adrian Testa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jochen Müller Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland
Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Jochen Müller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Marco Guidi Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Kantonsspital, Aarau, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Marco Guidi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Christian Candrian Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland
Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Christian Candrian in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

-union. In this light, evidence-based data could guide surgeons in understanding the biomechanical properties of the different options to choose the most suitable implant and provide the best fixation strategy. Figure 1 Classic crossed screw fixation

Open access
Wout Füssenich Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Wout Füssenich in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gesine H Seeber Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
University Hospital for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery Pius-Hospital, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

Search for other papers by Gesine H Seeber in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Julian R Zwoferink Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Julian R Zwoferink in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Matthijs P Somford Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Matthijs P Somford in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Martin Stevens Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Martin Stevens in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

-union of 2.8% compared to 6.5% for plate fixation, 11.1% for crossed screw fixation, and 12.5% for a plate with a cross plate compression screw. Superior biomechanical stability explains the low non-union frequency of fixation with a plate with a lag screw

Open access