Search for other papers by Michele Vasso in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alexander Antoniadis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Naeder Helmy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. However, bearing dislocation is still reported as the predominant mechanism of failure in mobile-bearing UKAs. 49 Mechanical loosening, lateral OA and unexplained pain are other mechanisms of failure, with revision for patellofemoral problems and PE
Search for other papers by Stein J. Janssen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Iris van Oost in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefan J.M. Breugem in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rutger C.I. van Geenen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
progression (1.4%), aseptic loosening (1.3%), bearing dislocation (0.58%), pain (0.57%), and infection (0.47%). 3 Proper patient selection is key for success; ideal candidates present with painful isolated bone-on-bone anteromedial osteoarthritis with a
Search for other papers by E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Primitivo Gómez-Cardero in
Google Scholar
PubMed
; the most common cause was bearing dislocation. The implant survival rate at 12 years with revision for any reason as the end point was 84.1%. Minimally invasive mobile-bearing UKA in Asian patients who needed high ranges of knee flexion demonstrated
Search for other papers by Claudio Legnani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrea Parente in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Franco Parente in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alberto Ventura in
Google Scholar
PubMed
use a thicker inlay to avoid bearing dislocation thus resulting in valgus overcorrection ( 27 ). For this reason, some authors suggest the use of a fixed-bearing prosthesis, which allows the possibility to cope with residual medial laxity without
