Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 30 items for :

  • "arthroscopic debridement" x
Clear All
Huub H. de Klerk Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Huub H. de Klerk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Chantal L. Welsink Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Chantal L. Welsink in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Anne J. Spaans Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen/Boxmeer, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Anne J. Spaans in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Lukas P. E. Verweij Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences (AMS), Academic Center for Evidence-Based Sports Medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Lukas P. E. Verweij in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Michel P. J. van den Bekerom Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Michel P. J. van den Bekerom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

-inflammatory medication, and long-term activity modification. 1 Literature describes many different surgical procedures for elbow OA, both arthroscopic and open, including arthroscopic debridement with or without radial head resection, 4 – 20 open debridement

Open access
Daniel J. McCormack Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK

Search for other papers by Daniel J. McCormack in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Darren Puttock Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK

Search for other papers by Darren Puttock in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Steven P. Godsiff Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK

Search for other papers by Steven P. Godsiff in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

of choice would be a total knee arthroplasty; however, this involves removing healthy joint surfaces. Arthroscopic debridement in the osteoarthritic knee has fallen out of favour due to poor clinical results. 1 Recently, a trend has developed

Open access
Carlos A. Encinas-Ullán Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by Carlos A. Encinas-Ullán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

arthroscopic treatment. The minimum follow-up was one year; the average KSS knee score improved from 63.8 to 90.9, whereas the average KSS function score improved from 65.4 to 90.4. There was no recurrence. Arthroscopic debridement for soft-tissue impingement

Open access
Luciano A. Rossi Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires City, Argentina

Search for other papers by Luciano A. Rossi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Maximiliano Ranalletta Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires City, Argentina

Search for other papers by Maximiliano Ranalletta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

successfully treated in the short term with arthroscopic debridement alone, whereas grade 3 tears (> 6 mm depth) should be repaired. 1 , 2 However, PBRCTs should be approached more aggressively, with debridement for grade 1 tears only and with repair for

Open access
Petra Izakovicova HELIOS Klinik Zerbst/Anhalt, Germany

Search for other papers by Petra Izakovicova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Olivier Borens Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Olivier Borens in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Andrej Trampuz Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Andrej Trampuz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Arthroscopic debridement and irrigation are not recommended as there the outcome is worse when compared with open surgical revision. 64 , 65 Its limitations are inability to perform adequate debridement and exchange of the mobile parts of the prosthesis

Open access
Haroon Majeed Wrightington Hospital, UK

Search for other papers by Haroon Majeed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Donald J. McBride The Royal Stoke University Hospital, UK

Search for other papers by Donald J. McBride in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

% potentially requiring a subtalar fusion. 8 , 11 In Hawkins type II fractures, an arthroscopic assessment is recommended and, depending on the chondral damage and size of the comminuted fragments, arthroscopic debridement is considered the most suitable

Open access
Jonny K. Andersson Department of Hand Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden and Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden

Search for other papers by Jonny K. Andersson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

four to six weeks after trauma with suture repair or re-insertion and pinning. Partial injuries are not best treated by open surgery. Instead, the treatment options are arthroscopic debridement or thermal shrinkage, pinning or physiotherapy with the re

Open access
Fabian Krause Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Fabian Krause in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Helen Anwander Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Helen Anwander in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

osteochondral defects of the talus after arthroscopic debridement and microfracture . Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 2016 24 1286 – 1292 . ( https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3928-6 ) 10.1007/s00167-015-3928-6 26713327 20. Schuh A Salminen

Open access
Young Yi Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inje University, Seoul Paik Hospital, 85, 2-ga, Jeo-dong, Jung-gu, Seoul, 100-032, Republic of Korea

Search for other papers by Young Yi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Woochun Lee Seoul Foot and Ankle Center, Dubalo Orthopaedic Clinic, 764-30, Bang bae dong, Seochogu, Seoul, 06554, Republic of Korea.

Search for other papers by Woochun Lee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

. 2 The treatment for ankle arthritis varies according to the cause and severity of the cartilage degeneration. For example, arthroscopic debridement, spur excision or ligament reconstruction have been attempted for early-stage degenerative

Open access
E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
Osteoarticular Surgery Research, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research – IdiPAZ (La Paz University Hospital – Autonomous University of Madrid), Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Carlos A Encinas-Ullán Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by Carlos A Encinas-Ullán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Juan S Ruiz-Pérez Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by Juan S Ruiz-Pérez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Primitivo Gómez-Cardero Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by Primitivo Gómez-Cardero in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

treated by means of arthroscopic debridement. Figure 3 shows a case of chronic ankle instability arthroscopically treated. Figure 1 Arthroscopic excision of a bony spur in the anterior distal tibia that caused painful anterior bony impingement of

Open access