Search Results
Search for other papers by Johannes Barth in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jerôme Garret in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luca Nover in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Floris van Rooij in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Clavert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by The Société Francophone d'Arthroscopie * in
Google Scholar
PubMed
level I to III ( 16 ) that compare outcomes of RCR with and without adjuvant DCR, with no limits to sample sizes or prevalence in the included studies. Studies that report postoperative ROM, clinical scores, complications and/or reoperations
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Search for other papers by Marko Nabergoj in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Patrick J. Denard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Collin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Search for other papers by Rihard Trebše in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Alexandre Lädermann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
4 and zone 7 ( Fig. 1 ). 8 Loosening is defined as displacement of the humeral component in the period between the initial postoperative radiograph and the most recent follow-up, or if radiolucencies > 2 mm are present in more than three zones. 8
Search for other papers by Huub H. de Klerk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chantal L. Welsink in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anne J. Spaans in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lukas P. E. Verweij in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Michel P. J. van den Bekerom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
postoperative ROM flexion outcomes for both groups. In conclusion, the optimal surgical treatment of symptomatic primary elbow OA should be determined depending on the patients’ and surgeons’ characteristics. This review can help surgeons to inform patients
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Search for other papers by Marko Nabergoj in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Patrick J. Denard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Collin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Search for other papers by Rihard Trebše in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Alexandre Lädermann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
‘complication’ following RSA as any intraoperative or postoperative event that was likely to have a negative influence on the patient’s final outcome. These included fractures, infections, dislocations, nerve palsies, aseptic loosening of humeral or glenoid
Search for other papers by Jonathon C Coward in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefan Bauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stephanie M Babic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Charline Coron in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Chirurgie de l’Épaule, Service d’Orthopédie et Traumatologie, Ensemble Hospitalier de la Côte, Morges, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Taro Okamoto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by William G Blakeney in
Google Scholar
PubMed
the final post-operative follow-up, both groups had significantly improved in all three functional outcome scores, but there was no longer a significant difference between the two groups. Importantly, the authors did not differentiate outcomes between
Search for other papers by Luciano A. Rossi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maximiliano Ranalletta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
return to sports and functional outcomes after in situ repair of articular and bursal PTRCTs. Moreover, studies comparing in situ repair with other techniques are also analysed. Lastly, as there is no current ‘benchmark’ for their management, the aim of
Search for other papers by Nicolas Bonnevialle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Florence Dauzères in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julien Toulemonde in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fanny Elia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jean-Michel Laffosse in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pierre Mansat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-superior subluxation of the humerus. In cases of RSA, Jacquot et al 21 did not improve functional outcomes after removal of the implant and identified a high rate of post-operative complications. Bone loss and soft-tissue impairment after such constrained
Search for other papers by George Mihai Avram in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aleksandra Królikowska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Berte Bøe in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paweł Reichert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ion-Andrei Popescu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg a.d.H., Germany
Search for other papers by Roland Becker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg a.d.H., Germany
Search for other papers by Robert Prill in
Google Scholar
PubMed
and postoperative active range of motion, patient-reported outcome measures, implant-related parameters that the authors chose to report in their respective studies, prosthesis design, radiographic assessment of graft integration at follow-up, and
Search for other papers by Karthik Karuppaiah in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joydeep Sinha in
Google Scholar
PubMed
patients. This study established improved postoperative outcomes for patients managed with Restore graft augmentation compared with their preoperative condition. However, the lack of a control group in his study makes it difficult to conclude that the
Search for other papers by Felix H. Savoie in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael O’Brien in
Google Scholar
PubMed
of the native ligament is sutured to the allograft. The flexor pronator fascia is closed with absorbable suture. Post-operative management The patient is placed in a removable hinged brace on the first post-operative visit, usually one week
