Search Results
Search for other papers by Christian Smith in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Razi Zaidi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jagmeet Bhamra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anna Bridgens in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Caesar Wek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michail Kokkinakis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
adults where data for paediatric patients was not readily separable - Pathology other than flexible pes planus (e.g. tarsal coalition, neurogenic pes planus) - Lack of reported meaningful radiological, kinematic or clinical outcomes
Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Reinier Feitz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Yara E. van Kooij in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marloes H. P. ter Stege in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Mark J. W. van der Oest in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J. Sebastiaan Souer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Robbert M. Wouters in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Harm P. Slijper in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Ruud W. Selles in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Steven E. R. Hovius in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hand–Wrist Study Group in
Google Scholar
PubMed
distributed via email. Patients were asked to complete validated Dutch versions of hand-specific patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) at baseline and after surgery depending on the type of treatment. 7 Amongst other PROMs, we use the Boston
St George’s, University of London, London, UK
Search for other papers by Daniel Murphy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mohsen Raza in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hiba Khan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University College London (UCL), London, UK
Search for other papers by Deborah M. Eastwood in
Google Scholar
PubMed
St George’s, University of London, London, UK
Search for other papers by Yael Gelfer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
; patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); and complications ( Table 1 ). Articles were categorized by trial intervention. Data were extracted into a standardized collection form using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Bias
Center of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders (CoRPS), Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
Search for other papers by Frederique J. Hafkamp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Taco Gosens in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders (CoRPS), Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
Department of Medical Psychology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands
Search for other papers by Jolanda de Vries in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders (CoRPS), Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
Search for other papers by Brenda L. den Oudsten in
Google Scholar
PubMed
patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction in total hip arthroplasty? A prospective, multicenter study . J Arthroplasty 2017 ; 32 : 3322 – 3327 . 20. Jain D Nguyen LL Bendich I et al. Higher patient expectations
Search for other papers by Thomas J. Holme in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marta Karbowiak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jennifer Clements in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ritesh Sharma in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johnathan Craik in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Najab Ellahee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. Eligibility criteria The inclusion criteria were: articles with patients undergoing thumb CMCJ prosthetic total joint replacement for arthritis, results published as a full paper in any language; outcome measures including patient or clinician-reported
Search for other papers by Francesco Smeraglia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Federico Tamborini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Leonardo Garutti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrea Minini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Morena A. Basso in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mario Cherubino in
Google Scholar
PubMed
3 compared two techniques: open vs. mini-open. The number of compartments released in each study is indicated in Table 1 . Outcomes Patient satisfaction was reported in five studies. 3 , 11 , 12 , 16 , 17 Pain relief (visual analogue
Search for other papers by Mohsen Raza in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Daniel Murphy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
St George’s, University of London, London, UK
Search for other papers by Yael Gelfer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
models of the relevant deformity to help guide and perform simulated osteotomy techniques. The reported quantitative outcomes were surgical operating time, fluoroscopy time and radiographic angle measurement. 18 , 19 There was no significant
Search for other papers by Maik Sliepen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matthijs Lipperts in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marianne Tjur in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre of Research in Rehabilitation (CORIR), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Denmark
Search for other papers by Inger Mechlenburg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, it is important that clinicians and researchers co-operate to determine the most relevant outcome parameters. Where is the added clinical value of activity sensors in orthopaedics? Since the introduction of patient-reported outcome measures
Search for other papers by Alpesh Kothari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Javier Masquijo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
excellent or good outcome in 58 of 75 feet (77%) with a 23% recurrence rate in a cohort of patients followed up for 2–23 years. 21 Chambers et al reported no recurrence in 29 CNC resected with EDB interposition. 22 In a small comparative study
Search for other papers by Abdus S. Burahee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrew D. Sanders in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dominic M. Power in
Google Scholar
PubMed
measurements of sensation and motor strength form the basis of surgeon-derived measures of outcome; however, patient-reported outcomes, pain and procedural satisfaction provide the most useful measures of surgery success. New symptoms that develop due to nerve