Search for other papers by Bülent Atilla in
Google Scholar
PubMed
linea aspera, exposing the sciatic nerve under visual control as a routine part of the exposure. Although good results have been published regarding cemented reconstructions, there is an increased tendency to perform non-cemented techniques in recent
Search for other papers by Oliver Marin-Peña in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marc Tey-Pons in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luis Perez-Carro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hatem G. Said in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pablo Sierra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pedro Dantas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Richard N. Villar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
damage to the sciatic nerve but it can be very helpful for the removal of posterior loose bodies. The mid-anterior and proximal mid-anterior can be used while working on the peripheral compartment. Fig. 1 Arthroscopic portals (right hip). ASIS
Search for other papers by George C. Babis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vasileios S. Nikolaou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
fracture or osteolysis. In such cases the distal flange cannot be securely embedded and the sciatic nerve can also be at risk. 55 Recently, Sculco et al 61 presented the concept of the ‘half cup-cage reconstruction’ to address some of the
Search for other papers by Philippe Chiron in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicolas Reina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
¼ (infrafoveal) or ⅓ (suprafoveal) of the head which are located at the bottom and to the front; a posterior wall fracture could still occur ( 1 ) ( Fig. 3 ). Mechanism of an infrafoveal fracture of 1/4 or 1/3 of the head. The sciatic nerve can
Search for other papers by Heide Delbrück in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yannik Gehlen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Frank Hildebrand in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Reinald Brunner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
reconstruction Comparison No Outcomes Percentage of hip redisplacement at follow-up Search words and combinations with Boolean operators are listed in Table 2 . Table 2 Search words and combinations with Boolean operators
Search for other papers by David Lin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alexander Charalambous in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sammy A. Hanna in
Google Scholar
PubMed
1/2) 15.2 (10–42) 86.3 (72–96) Ye et al, 2014 11 30 37.2 (28–52) 29.3 (15–40) Standard, Undisclosed Uncemented Femoral nerve palsy (1) Dislocation (1) Superficial infection (1) Indomethacin None 24.8 (15–42) 83
Academic Orthopaedic Department, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Aristotle University Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
Centre of Orthopaedics and Regenerative Medicine (CORE) – Centre of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI) – Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Greece
Search for other papers by Eustathios Kenanidis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Gennimatas General Hospital, Cholargos, Athens, Greece
Search for other papers by George Kyriakopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rajiv Kaila in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Panayiotis Christofilopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
posterior inferior iliac spines along the middle gluteal line. 5 Both of these are innervated by the superior gluteal nerve; 5 however, variable primary innervation patterns have been reported. 6 The GMed has three distinct parts, the anterior
Search for other papers by Markus S. Hanke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Till D. Lerch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Florian Schmaranzer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Malin K. Meier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simon D. Steppacher in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Klaus A. Siebenrock in
Google Scholar
PubMed
.7% 126 2 Complication with outpatient or medication treatment Temporary nerve injury 2–7% 119 , 122 , 123 , 127 Permanent nerve injury < 1% 122 Perineal skin damage < 1% 119 , 122 , 123 , 128
Search for other papers by Demien Broekhuis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rutger Tordoir in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zoe Vallinga in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jan Schoones in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bart Pijls in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rob Nelissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
reconstruction techniques have been proposed, including structural allografts, bone impaction grafting, jumbo cups, anti-protrusion cages, trabecular metal augments, cup-cage combinations, oblong cups and custom-made cages ( 4 , 5 , 7 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10
Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Traumatologie et Chirurgie Réparatrice des Membres, Hôpital d’Instruction des Armées Percy, France
Search for other papers by Nicolas de l’Escalopier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marjorie Salga in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laure Gatin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by François Genêt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Denormandie in
Google Scholar
PubMed
head necrosis. Fig. 2 3D reconstruction showing neurogenic heterotopic ossification associated with a proximal femoral fracture. NHO can develop in numerous locations around the hip, and development of NHO in these sites appears to
