Search for other papers by Allan Roy Sekeitto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nkhodiseni Sikhauli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dick Ronald van der Jagt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lipalo Mokete in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jurek R.T. Pietrzak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. Acta Orthop 2017 ; 88 : 383 – 389 . 47. de Vries LMA Neve WC Steens J . Prosthesis retention after an infected hip prosthesis: hip fractures versus primary total hip prosthesis, data from 1998–2015 . J Bone Jt
Search for other papers by Nikolaos Patsiogiannis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Center, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
Search for other papers by Nikolaos K. Kanakaris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Center, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
Search for other papers by Peter V. Giannoudis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
classification has also been proposed, which divides patients into those with previously ‘happy’ vs. ‘unhappy hips’, based on the presence of radiographic or clinical evidence (prior to the fracture event) of a failing prosthesis. 4 More recently, the UCS
Search for other papers by Julia Riemenschneider in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jan Tilmann Vollrath in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nils Mühlenfeld in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johannes Frank in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ingo Marzi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maren Janko in
Google Scholar
PubMed
of a total endoprosthesis after fall on the left hip. Due to the dislocated cup of the endoprosthesis only stabilization of the acetabular fracture by a MUTARS prosthesis was possible. After an acetabular roof plastic with allogeneic bone material was
Search for other papers by Gerhard M. Hobusch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kevin Döring in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Biomechatronics Group, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Search for other papers by Rickard Brånemark in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Reinhard Windhager in
Google Scholar
PubMed
respective categories by the rank of the journal of interest. Literature research was performed up to 1 October 2019. The following search-fields were used to identify target studies: amputation, osseointegration/bone-anchored prosthesis, amputation, bridge
Search for other papers by Thomas Tampere in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matthieu Ollivier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christophe Jacquet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maxime Fabre-Aubrespy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, International Knee and Joint Centre, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Search for other papers by Sébastien Parratte in
Google Scholar
PubMed
prosthesis, it is recommended to use long and fully cemented stems, to optimize stability. As mentioned above, previous orthopaedic procedures, such as ipsilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) might increase the risk of a post-operative inter
Search for other papers by Josep Muñoz Vives in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jean-Christophe Bel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Arantxa Capel Agundez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francisco Chana Rodríguez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by José Palomo Traver in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Morten Schultz-Larsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Theodoros Tosounidis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, and a hip prosthesis in combination with a retrograde femur nail creates a stress riser in the small area between the two implants, producing a high risk of a fracture, and a dynamic hip screw might cause the same problem in combination with a locking
Search for other papers by Tim Pohlemann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Steven C. Herath in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Benedikt J. Braun in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mika F. Rollmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tina Histing in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antonius Pizanis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
ilioinguinal approach does not allow any visualization of the hip joint itself, therefore the correct reduction of the articular surface must be verified using absolute anatomic reduction and alignment of all accessible fracture lines as well as fluoroscopic
Search for other papers by Karl Stoffel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christoph Sommer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mark Lee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tracy Y Zhu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Karsten Schwieger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christopher Finkemeier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
sometimes covered by the prosthesis. The lack of landmarks makes it difficult to obtain accurate anatomical reduction. Blood supply around the knee may be impaired. Local osteoporosis is common. The femoral component of the total knee arthroplasty (TKA