Search for other papers by Jean-Pierre St Mart in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by En Lin Goh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zameer Shah in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, enhancing clinical outcomes. 15 , 16 This review aims to summarize the history and development of robotic technology in orthopaedic surgery, and discuss the evidence base surrounding its use. Evolution of robotic surgery in orthopaedics There
Search for other papers by Adrian J. Cassar-Gheiti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rosie McColgan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Kelly in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Theresa M. Cassar-Gheiti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Connolly Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, Dublin, Ireland
Search for other papers by Paddy Kenny in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Colin G. Murphy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, have different broaching techniques and make comparisons misleading. With the evolution of cemented implants, the introduction of newer implants which have hybrid properties, and the use of different broaching techniques, the classification of these
Search for other papers by Hanna Wellauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Roman Heuberger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Emanuel Gautier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Moritz Tannast in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hubert Steinke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Peter Wahl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
graphical illustration of the evolution from the CLS stem to the GTS stem ( 4 ). There also is a marketing brochure from the manufacturer for both stems together, including high-quality pictures to illustrate the similarities between both systems ( 5 ). Of
Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Hanna Wellauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Roman Heuberger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Emanuel Gautier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Moritz Tannast in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hubert Steinke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Peter Wahl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
chose a head diameter of 22.25 mm ( 5 ). Starting from there, THA had widespread success ( 6 , 7 ). Evolution of cemented stems Charnley used a lateral incision with a trochanteric osteotomy ( 5 , 9 , 10 ). Buchholz, a surgeon from Germany and
Search for other papers by Theofilos Karachalios in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by George Komnos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antonios Koutalos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Orthop 2011 ; 35 : 1109 - 1118 . 5. Kumar N Arora GN Datta B . Bearing surfaces in hip replacement - Evolution and likely future . Med J Armed Forces India 2014 ; 70 : 371 - 376 . 6. Wang W
Search for other papers by Demien Broekhuis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rutger Tordoir in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zoe Vallinga in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jan Schoones in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bart Pijls in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rob Nelissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
.03–0.4%). For every additional prior THA revision, the CTAC failure rate increased by 4.2% (95% CI 1.0% to 7.5%). Regarding the evolution of the CTAC technique, the year in which the study started was positively associated with implant survival: implant failure
Department of Surgery, Albany Health Campus, Albany, Australia
Search for other papers by William G. Blakeney in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jean-Alain Epinette in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
Search for other papers by Pascal-André Vendittoli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bousquet in Saint-Etienne (France), takes the double principle of a small articulation to minimize the problems of wear, coupled with a large articulation to stabilize the hip and prevent instability. 1 – 3 Dual mobility hip design and evolution
Search for other papers by Charles Rivière in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefan Lazic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Loïc Villet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yann Wiart in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sarah Muirhead Allwood in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Justin Cobb in
Google Scholar
PubMed
progressive evolution of THA towards a more anatomical technique aiming to better restore the native hip centre of rotation 5 and acetabular anteversion ( Fig. 2 ). 45 , 46 A technique for aligning the prosthetic cup parallel to the transverse
Search for other papers by Babar Kayani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sujith Konan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Atif Ayuob in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Salamah Ayyad in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fares S. Haddad in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. References 1. Learmonth ID Young C Rorabeck C . The operation of the century: total hip replacement . Lancet 2007 ; 370 : 1508 – 1519 . 2. Smith-Petersen MN . The classic: evolution of mould
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
Fondazione Livio Sciutto Onlus, Campus Savona - Università degli Studi di Genova, Via Magliotto 2, Savona, Italy
Search for other papers by Mattia Loppini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Francesco Manlio Gambaro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marco di Maio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Fondazione Livio Sciutto Onlus, Campus Savona - Università degli Studi di Genova, Via Magliotto 2, Savona, Italy
Search for other papers by Guido Grappiolo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
this classification was the dynamic grading of the defect. Because the bone is continuously reshaping, emphasizing the possible evolution not only overtime but even intra-operatively of the defect, the authors decided to not distinguish bone loss into
