Search Results
Search for other papers by Salvi Prat-Fabregat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pilar Camacho-Carrasco in
Google Scholar
PubMed
that, with an infection rate of 7.6%, this ‘common fear does not appear to be clinically grounded’, 7 an even more recent paper analysing proximal and distal tibial fractures 8 supports the view that, with an infection rate of 12% in proximal
Hospital Militar de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
Search for other papers by Nicolás Franulic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by José Tomas Muñoz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Clínica Alemana - Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
Search for other papers by Francisco Figueroa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Piero Innocenti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicolás Gaggero in
Google Scholar
PubMed
the proximal tibiofibular joint. Right: Type II fractures extend distal to the proximal tibiofibular joint and Type III fractures extends into the lateral tibial plateau.. A recent biomechanical study conducted by Kang et al. ( 28
Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain
Search for other papers by Elena Gálvez-Sirvent in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aitor Ibarzábal-Gil in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Osteoarticular Surgery Research, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research – IdiPAZ (La Paz University Hospital – Autonomous University of Madrid), Madrid, Spain
Search for other papers by E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
differences following tibial plateau fractures versus distal femoral fractures . Trauma Monthly 2015 20 e21635. ( https://doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.21635 ) 117. Liu Z Wang S Tian X Peng A . The relationship between the injury mechanism and the
Search for other papers by Nuno Marques Luís in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ricardo Varatojo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-shaft angle (FS–TS) ( Fig. 2 ). This angle is defined by a line drawn from the centre of the proximal femoral shaft towards the knee and a line from the centre of the tibial shaft distal to the knee. To calculate the femoral and tibial shaft points, it usually
Search for other papers by Francesco Benazzo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefano M.P. Rossi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alberto Combi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sanjay Meena in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matteo Ghiara in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. Choosing the right approach can sometimes be complicated if a double approach was previously performed for a tibial plateau fracture. In such cases, a median incision can be performed, but it has to follow one of the two previous scars distally. Concerning
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for other papers by Charles Rivière in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford, UK
Search for other papers by William Jackson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for other papers by Loïc Villet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
South-West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, UK
Search for other papers by Sivan Sivaloganathan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Shamir Medical Center, Zriffin, Israel
Search for other papers by Yaron Barziv in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Département de Chirurgie, Université de Montréal, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, Québec, Canada
Search for other papers by Pascal-André Vendittoli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
joint line orientation (severe frontal joint line obliquity, high tibial posterior slope) Patella maltracking Difficulty in estimating native knee anatomy (mainly articular bone loss) Acquired lower limb malalignment from previous fracture malunion
Search for other papers by Andrea Ferrera in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Jacques Menetrey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
mechanical femoral angle aMDFA 6 ± 1° Anatomical lateral distal femoral angle aLDFA 81 ± 2° Mechanical lateral distal femoral angle mLDFA 87 ± 3° Anatomical medial proximal tibial angle aMPTA 87 ± 3° Mechanical medial
Search for other papers by Alfonso Vaquero-Picado in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
.1 mm. 9 The femoral attachment is 7.4 mm from the trochlear point, 11.0 mm from the medial arch point and 7.9 mm from the distal articular cartilage. 9 The centre of the ALB tibial attachment site is 6.1 mm from posteromedial meniscus root
Search for other papers by Jimmy Ng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pau Balcells-Nolla in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Peter J. James in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Benjamin V. Bloch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Intraoperative Gaining exposure to stiff knee causing quadriceps tendon rupture, patella tendon rupture or tibial tubercle avulsion V-Y turn down Over resection of patella causing patella fracture (must leave at least 12–15 mm bone) Postoperative Trauma
Search for other papers by Francesco Pirato in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Federica Rosso in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Federico Dettoni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Davide Edoardo Bonasia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matteo Bruzzone in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Roberto Rossi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
stiffness. Patella baja management presents some corrective measures with the aim to reestablishing the joint line. Use of distal femoral augments, tibial tubercle osteotomy with proximal displacement, lengthening of the patellar tendon and placement of the
