-bearing versus fixed-bearing UKA There is controversy in the literature regarding which type of bearing is preferable: mobile or fixed. In 2015, Ko et al reported a systematic review of comparative studies between fixed and mobile bearings focussing on
E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán and Primitivo Gómez-Cardero
Gilles Pasquier, Matthieu Ehlinger, and Didier Mainard
multidirectional stresses, they often have complications: wear of the bearings, loosening or patellar complications. 10 Their worse outcomes compared to unconstrained implants, as well as higher infection rates, have reduced their use in some neurological
Michele Vasso, Alexander Antoniadis, and Naeder Helmy
bearings, it has been theorized that a surgeon may tend to choose a tight knee and risk slight valgus overcorrection to avoid bearing dislocation in mobile UKA. This results in greater contact stresses and over-loading of the lateral compartment
Stein J. Janssen, Iris van Oost, Stefan J.M. Breugem, and Rutger C.I. van Geenen
normally functioning Oxford UKA (Phase-1 and 2) bearings demonstrated a mean wear of 0.01 mm/year. 85 , 86 Such a low rate will not cause in vivo penetration or alter alignment (±1° degree varus per 1 mm wear). 85 However, several factors can accelerate
Mark Anthony Roussot and Fares Sami Haddad
higher degrees of flexion within a deepening femoral sulcus, 13 and are at a disadvantage for wear, since bearings perform best when softer materials are concave rather than convex. 37 The modified dome or Gaussian shape with a convex centre and
Richard Peter Almeida, Lipalo Mokete, Nkhodiseni Sikhauli, Allan Roy Sekeitto, and Jurek Pietrzak
reduce the infective microbial load around the prosthesis and wound, including breaking down biofilm. 1 , 11 Surgical management involves open deep debridement of the joint and thorough wound irrigation and wherever possible modular bearings should be
Daniel J. McCormack, Darren Puttock, and Steven P. Godsiff
MR Oh KJ . Outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative studies between fixed and mobile bearings focusing on complications . Knee Surg Relat Res 2015 ; 27 : 141 – 148 . 20. Cao Z
Timothy Lording, Sébastien Lustig, and Philippe Neyret
. 18. Collier MB , Engh CA Jr , McAuley JP , Engh GA . Factors associated with the loss of thickness of polyethylene tibial bearings after knee arthroplasty . J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007 ; 89–A : 1306 – 1314
Jimmy Wui Guan Ng, Benjamin V. Bloch, and Peter J. James
I pick? Bone Joint J 2013 ; 11 : 129 – 132 . 59. Peters CL Mulkey P Erickson J Anderson MB Pelt CE . Comparison of total knee arthroplasty with highly congruent anterior-stabilized bearings
Jun Zhang, Erhu Li, and Yuan Zhang
Erickson J Anderson MB Pelt CE . Comparison of total knee arthroplasty with highly congruent anterior-stabilized bearings versus a cruciate-retaining design . Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2014 472 175 – 180 . ( https://doi.org/10