Search Results
Search for other papers by Francisco Figueroa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David Figueroa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by João Espregueira-Mendes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
or desire for future participation in cutting or pivoting sports. There are multiple graft options for ACL reconstruction including bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft, quadriceps tendon autograft, hamstring tendon autograft and several
Search for other papers by Nikolaos K. Paschos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stephen M. Howell in
Google Scholar
PubMed
of contention. 28 Also, allograft versus autograft has also been a topic of controversy. Regarding the intervention type, the description of the double-bundle technique created expectations for a more anatomical technique, but there is dispute
Hospital Sotero del Rio, Santiago, Chile
Search for other papers by Francisco Figueroa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David Figueroa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rafael Calvo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Hospital Padre Hurtado, Santiago, Chile
Search for other papers by Alex Vaisman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by João Espregueira-Mendes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
treatment, there is an increased risk of articular cartilage damage and graft failure and a long-term risk of joint dysfunction. 3 – 6 Hamstring autograft use has been linked to an increased risk of infection after ACL reconstruction compared to other
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK
Search for other papers by Joanna Baawa-Ameyaw in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK
Search for other papers by Ricci Plastow in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK
Search for other papers by Fahima Aarah Begum in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK
Search for other papers by Babar Kayani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK
Search for other papers by Hyder Jeddy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK
Search for other papers by Fares Haddad in
Google Scholar
PubMed
commonly used grafts for ACLR include hamstring tendon (HT), bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) and quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts, allografts and synthetic grafts. However, there is no uniform consensus on the single best graft choice for ACLR, with
Clínica Alemana-Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
Search for other papers by Francisco Figueroa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David Figueroa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rafael Calvo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Hospital Padre Hurtado, Santiago, Chile
Search for other papers by Alex Vaisman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Dom Henrique Research Centre, Portugal
3Bs Research Group – Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
ICVS/3Bs–PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga, Portugal
Orthopaedics Department of Minho University, Braga, Portugal
Search for other papers by João Espregueira-Mendes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
condition of the autograft tissues and the attempt to limit further damage to the patient by harvesting autografts. They suggest that such practical issues may in fact outweigh clinical evidence. Tisherman et al, 11 in another review of the literature
Search for other papers by Mukai Chimutengwende-Gordon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by James Donaldson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by George Bentley in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Mosaicplasty or osteochondral autograft transfer Mosaicplasty or the osteochondral autograft transfer system (OATS) results in immediate filling of osteochondral defects with hyaline cartilage. 13 The procedure involves harvesting multiple cylindrical
Osteoarticular Surgery Research, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research – IdiPAZ (La Paz University Hospital – Autonomous University of Madrid), Madrid, Spain
Search for other papers by E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hortensia De la Corte-Rodríguez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carlos A. Encinas-Ullán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Primitivo Gómez-Cardero in
Google Scholar
PubMed
used in MLKI reconstructions is another controversial issue. There are currently three options: autografts, allografts, or synthetic grafts, although we think that it is better to use a fresh frozen non-irradiated allograft. Each of these options has
Search for other papers by Mattia Alessio-Mazzola in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Giacomo Placella in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luigi Zagra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Orlando Leone in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Natasha Di Fabio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Desiree Moharamzadeh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vincenzo Salini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
) NR BPTB autograft 7 34 all components cemented; 1 component uncemented; 1 cemented femoral component; uncemented tibial component; patella resurfaced in all cases 24 cruciate sacrificing (posterior stabilized); 9 cruciate retaining; 3
Search for other papers by Jimmy Wui Guan Ng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yulanda Myint in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fazal M. Ali in
Google Scholar
PubMed
%) Note . NR, not reported; SMD, standardised mean difference. Graft choice Graft selection can be challenging in multiligament knee reconstruction. Surgeons have the option of using autograft, allograft or synthetic graft. Each of these
Search for other papers by Carlos A. Encinas-Ullán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-bundle anatomical (isolated sMCL reconstructions) Preserving the insertion of a semitendinosus autograft for augmentation repair for the sMCL has limitations. The graft does not reconstruct the course of the native MCL ligament (too anterior on the tibia). Grafts