Search for other papers by Christiaan J A van Bergen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pieter Bas de Witte in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Floor Willeboordse in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Babette L de Geest in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Magritha (Margret) M H P Foreman-van Drongelen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bart J Burger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yvon M den Hartog in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joost H van Linge in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Renske M Pereboom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simon G F Robben in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Adhiambo Witlox in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Melinda M E H Witbreuk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
background of the committee members, involvement of all relevant societies, comprehensive systematic literature review, and formulation of clear recommendations according to the GRADE approach. This approach provides a system for rating quality of evidence
Search for other papers by Marco Gupton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jessica Burns in
Google Scholar
PubMed
). Benefits There are multiple benefits of mNGS, starting with the above-mentioned unbiased approach. Often infection etiology is unknown, and there may be a wide array of different pathogens, especially in immunocompromised patients with opportunistic
Search for other papers by Marta Salom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Inês Balacó in
Google Scholar
PubMed
needle or with a mini-incisional approach with a trephine or bone trocar. Be sure to have sufficient material, which is well conditioned, and guarantee the rapid transport with proper and complete information with it. The biopsy must be discussed by the
Hospital Base de Valdivia, Valdivia, Chile
AO Foundation, PAEG Expert Group, Davos, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Matías Sepúlveda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Hospital Base de Valdivia, Valdivia, Chile
Search for other papers by Cecilia Téllez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Hospital Base de Valdivia, Valdivia, Chile
Search for other papers by Víctor Villablanca in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Hospital Base de Valdivia, Valdivia, Chile
Search for other papers by Estefanía Birrer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
the surgical approach and the need for an operation to remove the implant makes it unacceptable for most patients’ parents ( 27 ). Reduction and stabilization with an external fixator is an option for special cases, given its greater association with
Search for other papers by Hakan Ömeroğlu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Manuel Cassiano Neves in
Google Scholar
PubMed
complications. Besides, he warned surgeons about having limited knowledge of the non-operative treatment principles and about becoming impetuous to extensively approach the fracture sites and perform internal fixation in children’s fractures. 3 In 1984, in
Search for other papers by Manuel Saavedra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
AO Foundation, PAEG Expert Group, Davos, Switzerland
Hospital Base de Valdivia, Valdivia, Chile
Search for other papers by Matías Sepúlveda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
Hospital Clínico Mutual de Seguridad, Santiago, Chile
Search for other papers by María Jesús Tuca in
Google Scholar
PubMed
AO Foundation, PAEG Expert Group, Davos, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Estefanía Birrer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
in the body and posterior horn of the meniscus. They were designed to reduce surgical time and avoid external approaches, yet are not always available due to their higher cost. Moreover, the all-inside suturing technique can be technically challenging
Search for other papers by Ignacio Rodriguez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
AO Foundation, PAEG Expert Group, Davos, Switzerland
Hospital Base de Valdivia, Valdivia, Chile
Search for other papers by Matías Sepúlveda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Hospital Base de Valdivia, Valdivia, Chile
Search for other papers by Estefanía Birrer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
Hospital Clínico Mutual de Seguridad, Santiago, Chile
Search for other papers by María Jesús Tuca in
Google Scholar
PubMed
tuberosity fracture (A). Treatment involved open reduction and fixation with inter-fragmentary compression screws through an anterior approach, with repair of the periosteum sleeve (B, C). Open reduction can be achieved by either direct arthrotomy or
Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
Search for other papers by Gyula Domos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
Institute of Pancreatic Diseases, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
Search for other papers by Szilárd Váncsa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Csenge Szeverényi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gergely Agócs in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
Institute of Pancreatic Diseases, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
Search for other papers by Péter Hegyi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anna Perge in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Krisztina Békési in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
Search for other papers by Csaba Varga in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by György Szőke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
reduction, redislocation, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and residual dysplasia are the main reasons for secondary surgery and poor long-term outcomes. The treatment of hip dislocation is based on the principle of a step-by-step approach ( Fig. 1
