Orthopaedic Department, University General Hospital of Larissa, Greece
Search for other papers by Theofilos Karachalios in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by George A. Komnos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction It is widely accepted that total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a well-established reconstructive procedure for end-stage knee joint disorders and satisfactory survival rates have been reported at 15 years follow up. 1 – 4
Search for other papers by Simon Donell in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Historically, problems with the patella have accounted for half of the poor outcomes from total knee arthroplasty (TKA). 1 This was in the early days when there was no trochlear extension to the femoral component and before
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for other papers by Gautier Beckers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Clinique Orthopédique Duval, Laval, Quebec, Canada
Search for other papers by Vincent Massé in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Clinique Orthopédique Duval, Laval, Quebec, Canada
Search for other papers by Pascal-André Vendittoli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for other papers by Mina W Morcos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
recommended. Total knee arthroplasty Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is considered the gold standard treatment for patients with end-stage HA. TKA has been shown to significantly improve knee function, reduce pain and provide high patient satisfaction
National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, UK.
Search for other papers by Vikki Wylde in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrew Beswick in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julie Bruce in
Google Scholar
PubMed
National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, UK.
North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Search for other papers by Ashley Blom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicholas Howells in
Google Scholar
PubMed
National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, UK.
Search for other papers by Rachael Gooberman-Hill in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Classification of Diseases. 10 After total knee arthroplasty (TKA), pain severity plateaus at between three and six months after surgery, 11 , 12 and therefore chronic pain after TKA is best defined as pain that is present and bothersome at least three
Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Lombardy, Italy
Search for other papers by Francesco Benazzo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Loris Perticarini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eugenio Jannelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alessandro Ivone in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matteo Ghiara in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. There are currently three possible approaches to the patella during primary total knee arthroplasty: always resurface, never resurface, and selectively resurface. This last option is mainly dictated by pre and intraoperative findings such as preoperative
Search for other papers by Jean-Pierre St Mart in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by En Lin Goh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Background Conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a well-accepted, safe and cost-effective procedure for treating symptomatic end-stage knee osteoarthritis. 1 , 2 However, patient satisfaction remains an issue
Search for other papers by Jan Victor in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is, in essence, a resurfacing procedure, and should thus respect ligament tension in order to function properly. Failure mechanisms and indications for revision of TKA have shifted over time. In the
Search for other papers by Hee-Nee Pang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stephen Petis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Douglas D. R. Naudie in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Steven J. MacDonald in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a very successful operation that can deliver great patient satisfaction 1 , 2 with good implant survivorship. 3 Notwithstanding this, the number of revision TKAs is on the rise for a
Search for other papers by E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains the most reliable and efficacious treatment for patients with osteoarthritis resistant to conservative therapies. The stiff knee is a postoperative complication occurring in 4–16% of patients
Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK
Search for other papers by Babar Kayani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK
Search for other papers by Sujith Konan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK
Search for other papers by Atif Ayuob in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elliot Onochie in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Talal Al-Jabri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK
Search for other papers by Fares S. Haddad in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an established and highly effective treatment for patients with symptomatic end-stage knee osteoarthritis. 1 , 2 The procedure is performed in over 90,000 patients per year in the United
