Search for other papers by Andrea Angelini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ivan Bohacek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mihovil Plecko in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carlo Biz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Giulia Trovarelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mariachiara Cerchiaro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Giuseppe Di Rubbo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pietro Ruggieri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
to definitively treat by reconstruction. In some cases, patients may be able to compensate for the loss of the distal fibula with physical therapy and rehabilitation and may achieve a good level of function without reconstruction. Some authors suggest
Search for other papers by Olga D. Savvidou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Panagiotis Koutsouradis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by George D. Chloros in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ioannis Papanastasiou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thomas Sarlikiotis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aggelos Kaspiris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Panayiotis J. Papagelopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
the limitation of elbow ROM, and it has a relatively shorter rehabilitation time. 21 Currently, percutaneous ablation under CT guidance, for lesion localization, with radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) is the most effective treatment option
Search for other papers by Julie J. Willeumier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yvette M. van der Linden in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michiel A.J. van de Sande in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P.D. Sander Dijkstra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
radiographs are available. The selected rigid fixation should be durable for the remaining lifetime of the patient, while the recovery and rehabilitation time should not exceed the life expectancy . Survival can range from days to many years depending
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Catalin Cirstoiu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Bogdan Cretu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Bogdan Serban in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Zsombor Panti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Mihai Nica in
Google Scholar
PubMed
the joints it replaces (knee). This biological reconstruction technique is intended for paediatric patients, requiring a complex rehabilitation protocol with external prosthesis to compensate for the shortening of the limb. Although it is considered a
Department of Emergency Medicine, Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Irina-Anca Eremia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Emergency University Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Bogdan Serban in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Emergency University Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Mihnea Popa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Adela Iancu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Emergency Medicine, Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Silvia Nica in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Emergency University Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Catalin Cirstoiu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. Urologic Oncology 2016 34 433.e1 – 433.e8 . ( https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.05.017 ) 10 Ruppert LM . Malignant spinal cord compression: adapting conventional rehabilitation approaches . Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North
Search for other papers by Stephanie Marrannes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Klaas Victor in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nele Arnout in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tine De Backer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jan Victor in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thomas Tampere in
Google Scholar
PubMed
different thromboprophylactic agents and adverse events. In our opinion, a distinction should be made between both hip and knee patients as rehabilitation programmes after knee surgery might impose prolonged periods of immobilization, limited ambulation and
Search for other papers by Maria A. Smolle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dimosthenis Andreou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Per-Ulf Tunn in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andreas Leithner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
– mean follow-up of 65.3 months – mean bone resection length 18 cm (distal femur) and 24 cm (proximal femur) – Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) score at a mean of 26.3 after rehabilitation – 36.4 mm as mean lengthening distance – two implant related