Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 12 items for :

  • "prosthesis design" x
  • Shoulder & Elbow x
Clear All
Marko Nabergoj Valdoltra Orthopaedic Hospital, Ankaran, Slovenia
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Search for other papers by Marko Nabergoj in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Patrick J. Denard Department of Orthopaedic & Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA

Search for other papers by Patrick J. Denard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Philippe Collin Centre Hospitalier Privé Saint-Grégoire (Vivalto Santé), Saint-Grégoire, France

Search for other papers by Philippe Collin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rihard Trebše Valdoltra Orthopaedic Hospital, Ankaran, Slovenia
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Search for other papers by Rihard Trebše in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Alexandre Lädermann Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, La Tour Hospital, Meyrin, Switzerland
Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Alexandre Lädermann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

.7% and 0.6%, respectively. They found a decrease in revision rates after modification of the prosthesis design. Newer metal metaphyseal shell and polyethylene insert (0.2%) had a significantly lower rate of humeral component dissociation compared to the

Open access
Patrick Goetti Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Centre Hospitalier |Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Patrick Goetti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Patrick J. Denard Denard Department of Orthopaedic & Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States

Search for other papers by Patrick J. Denard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Philippe Collin Collin Centre Hospitalier Privé Saint-Grégoire (Vivalto Santé), Saint- Grégoire, France

Search for other papers by Philippe Collin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Ibrahim, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt

Search for other papers by Mohamed Ibrahim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Adrien Mazzolari Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, La Tour Hospital, Meyrin, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Adrien Mazzolari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Alexandre Lädermann Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, La Tour Hospital, Meyrin, Switzerland
Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Alexandre Lädermann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

replacement: a modelling study . Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2009 ; 24 : 254 – 260 . 100. Boileau P Watkinson DJ Hatzidakis AM Balg F . Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics . J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005

Open access
Marko Nabergoj Valdoltra Orthopaedic Hospital, Ankaran, Slovenia
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Search for other papers by Marko Nabergoj in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Patrick J. Denard Oregon Shoulder Institute, Medford, OR

Search for other papers by Patrick J. Denard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Philippe Collin Centre Hospitalier Privé Saint-Grégoire (Vivalto Santé), Saint- Grégoire, France

Search for other papers by Philippe Collin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rihard Trebše Valdoltra Orthopaedic Hospital, Ankaran, Slovenia
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Search for other papers by Rihard Trebše in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Alexandre Lädermann Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, La Tour Hospital
Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Alexandre Lädermann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Early reported complication rates with the Grammont-type reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) were very high, up to 24%.

  • A ‘problem’ is defined as an intraoperative or postoperative event that is not likely to affect the patient’s final outcome, such as intraoperative cement extravasation and radiographic changes. A ‘complication’ is defined as an intraoperative or postoperative event that is likely to affect the patient’s final outcome, including infection, neurologic injury and intrathoracic central glenoid screw placement.

  • Radiographic changes around the glenoid or humeral components of the RSA are very frequently observed and described in the literature.

  • High complication rates related to the Grammont RSA design led to development of non-Grammont designs which led to a dramatic fall in the majority of complications.

  • The percentage of radiological changes after RSA is not negligible and remains unsolved, despite a decrease in its occurrence in the last decade. However, such changes should be now considered as simple problems because they rarely have a negative influence on the patient’s final outcome, and their prevalence has dramatically decreased.

  • With further changes in indications and designs for RSA, it is crucial to accurately track the rates and types of complications to justify its new designs and increased indications.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:1109-1121. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210040

Open access
Hongfu Jin Department of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

Search for other papers by Hongfu Jin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Shide Jiang Department of Orthopaedics, The Central Hospital of Yongzhou, Yongzhou, Hunan, China

Search for other papers by Shide Jiang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Volotovski Pavel Republican Scientific and Practical Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Minsk, Belarus

Search for other papers by Volotovski Pavel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Djandan Tadum Arthur Vithran Department of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

Search for other papers by Djandan Tadum Arthur Vithran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Wenfeng Xiao Department of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

Search for other papers by Wenfeng Xiao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Yusheng Li Department of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

Search for other papers by Yusheng Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

-related research. Emerging trends Considerations for rTSA prosthesis design The development of rTSA prosthesis design has evolved from its early simplistic designs to the current more complex, individualized, and advanced stages. Currently, the implant

Open access
Jetske Viveen Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre and University, Adelaide, Australia
Upper Limb Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Jetske Viveen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Izaak F. Kodde Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Izaak F. Kodde in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Andras Heijink Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Andras Heijink in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Koen L. M. Koenraadt Foundation for Orthopedic Research, Care & Education, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Koen L. M. Koenraadt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michel P. J. van den Bekerom Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Michel P. J. van den Bekerom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Denise Eygendaal Upper Limb Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Denise Eygendaal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Since the introduction of the radial head prosthesis (RHP) in 1941, many designs have been introduced. It is not clear whether prosthesis design parameters are related to early failure. The aim of this systematic review is to report on failure modes and to explore the association between implant design and early failure.

  • A search was conducted to identify studies reporting on failed primary RHP. The results are clustered per type of RHP based on: material, fixation technique, modularity, and polarity. Chi-square tests are used to compare reasons for failure between the groups.

  • Thirty-four articles are included involving 152 failed radial head arthroplasties (RHAs) in 152 patients. Eighteen different types of RHPs have been used.

  • The most frequent reasons for revision surgery after RHA are (aseptic) loosening (30%), elbow stiffness (20%) and/or persisting pain (17%). Failure occurs after an average of 34 months (range, 0–348 months; median, 14 months).

  • Press-fit prostheses fail at a higher ratio because of symptomatic loosening than intentionally loose-fit prostheses and prostheses that are fixed with an expandable stem (p < 0.01).

  • Because of the many different types of RHP used to date and the limited numbers and evidence on early failure of RHA, the current data provide no evidence for a specific RHP design.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:659-667. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180099

Open access
Heri Suroto Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Dr. Soetomo General Hospital / Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
These authors contributed equally to this work

Search for other papers by Heri Suroto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Brigita De Vega Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, London, UK
Cell & Tissue Bank-Regenerative Medicine Centre, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
These authors contributed equally to this work

Search for other papers by Brigita De Vega in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Fani Deapsari Cell & Tissue Bank-Regenerative Medicine Centre, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia

Search for other papers by Fani Deapsari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tabita Prajasari Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Dr. Soetomo General Hospital / Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

Search for other papers by Tabita Prajasari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Pramono Ari Wibowo Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Dr. Soetomo General Hospital / Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

Search for other papers by Pramono Ari Wibowo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Steven K. Samijo Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, Heerlen, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by Steven K. Samijo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

graft or bone substitute, while the remaining studies did not provide adequate information. Table 2. ORIF and RTSA prosthesis characteristics No Author, publication year ORIF RTSA Prosthesis design Prosthesis

Open access
Thomas Kozak Albany Health Campus, Albany, Australia
Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia

Search for other papers by Thomas Kozak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Stefan Bauer Ensemble Hospitalier de la Côte, Morges, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Stefan Bauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gilles Walch Hôpital Privé Jean-Mermoz, Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France

Search for other papers by Gilles Walch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Saad Al-karawi Albany Health Campus, Albany, Australia

Search for other papers by Saad Al-karawi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
William Blakeney Albany Health Campus, Albany, Australia
Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia

Search for other papers by William Blakeney in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Grammont design (5.8% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.025). 59 This study, however, only looked at one lateralized prosthesis design. A more recent systematic review of 6583 RTSAs from 103 studies, found only a slight difference in aseptic loosening rates between

Open access
Daniel Bachman University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, USA

Search for other papers by Daniel Bachman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Akin Cil University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, USA

Search for other papers by Akin Cil in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

replacement of the distal humerus with a prosthesis designed to re-create the articulation with the proximal ulna and radial head. There were several historical devices used for this purpose although only one is currently available, the Latitude EV

Open access
Jeremie M. Axe
Search for other papers by Jeremie M. Axe in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

: 492 - 499 . 82. Boileau P , Watkinson DJ , Hatzidakis AM , Balg F . Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics . J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005 ; 14 ( 1 suppl S ): 147S - 161S . 83

Open access
Raul Barco Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by Raul Barco in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Olga D. Savvidou Athens University Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece

Search for other papers by Olga D. Savvidou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
John W. Sperling Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA

Search for other papers by John W. Sperling in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Joaquín Sanchez-Sotelo Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA

Search for other papers by Joaquín Sanchez-Sotelo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Robert H. Cofield Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA

Search for other papers by Robert H. Cofield in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012 ; 21 : 1470 - 1477 . PMID:22365818. 18. Boileau P , Watkinson DJ , Hatzidakis AM , Balg F . Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics . J Shoulder Elbow Surg

Open access