Search for other papers by Joshua B.V. Smith in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Habeeb Bishi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chao Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vipin Asopa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Richard E. Field in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David H. Sochart in
Google Scholar
PubMed
that it allows accurate prediction of prosthesis size, shape and position and this enables the aforementioned aims of THA to be achieved. 1 – 7 With a single templating software package, multiple implants from different manufactures can be templated
Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Hanna Wellauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Roman Heuberger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Emanuel Gautier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Moritz Tannast in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hubert Steinke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Peter Wahl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
developments of well-established designs, nearly all still being available nowadays. A citation from Santana, a Spanish philosopher, aptly captures the development of the hip prosthesis: ‘Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it’ ( 4
Search for other papers by Claude B. Rieker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
clinical results (elevated wear and friction). In the 1960s, the McKee-Farrar MoM THR was introduced. 23 Due to bearing irregularities as well as impingement, the system had a higher early failure rate than the Charnley prosthesis, which was based on a
Search for other papers by Adrian J. Cassar-Gheiti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rosie McColgan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Kelly in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Theresa M. Cassar-Gheiti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Connolly Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, Dublin, Ireland
Search for other papers by Paddy Kenny in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Colin G. Murphy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
four-part classification system, and summarize the long-term outcomes and national joint registry data for each respective type of cemented prosthesis. Basic science of cemented femoral stem fixation Bone cement Cement properties
Search for other papers by Dongmei Wu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rohan M Bhalekar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jordan S Marsh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David J Langton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alan J Stewart in
Google Scholar
PubMed
prosthesis, the volumetric particle wear rate is <1 mm 3 per million cycles compared with >100 mm 3 per million cycles in a failure device ( 23 ). The sizes of released metal particles are typically 1 nm–1 μm in diameter, with a mean size <50 nm ( 9 , 24
Search for other papers by David Lin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alexander Charalambous in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sammy A. Hanna in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The strength of our study is based on the comprehensive review of the available literature. The studies all used uncemented prosthesis and the vast majority (109/114) of operations were performed through a posterior approach. All studies also included
Search for other papers by Philippe Chiron in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicolas Reina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, it must be reduced and stabilised by osteosynthesis. A posterior approach is then required. Osteosynthesis is applicable in some cases with cervical fracture ( 43 ). A hip prosthesis may be indicated when the subject is elderly, the bone porotic
Search for other papers by Jonathan M. R. French in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paul Bramley in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sean Scattergood in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nemandra A. Sandiford in
Google Scholar
PubMed
acetabul*) ADJ4 prosthesis).ti,ab 5. exp “ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT”/ 6. (1 OR 2 OR 3 OR 4 OR 5) 7. (modular dual mobility).ti,ab 8. (modular dual-mobility).ti,ab 9. (7 OR 8) 10. (6 AND 9) Appendix 2. All other forest and funnel plots
Search for other papers by Dominic Davenport in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Venu Kavarthapu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
both. It is known that acetabular malposition may lead to increased rates of dislocation, 4 impingement, 5 edge-loading, 6 polyethylene wear, 7 pelvic osteolysis 4 and prosthesis failure. 8 Acetabular component positioning
Search for other papers by Mattia Loppini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Guido Grappiolo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
relevant articles for the study. Finally, a search of every prosthesis according to the name of the implant was performed. In the present review, we did not include all the conservative stems available for clinical practice. We defined as ‘short’ all the
