Filter

Refine by date

—

Refine by category

  • General Orthopaedics (52)
  • Print
  • Save

Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 52 items for :

  • "prosthesis" x
  • General Orthopaedics x
Clear All
Geke A. W. Denissen Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten (Dutch Arthroplasty Register), ’s Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Geke A. W. Denissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Liza N. van Steenbergen Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten (Dutch Arthroplasty Register), ’s Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Liza N. van Steenbergen in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Wouter T. Lollinga Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten (Dutch Arthroplasty Register), ’s Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Wouter T. Lollinga in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Nico J. J. Verdonschot Dept. of Biomechanics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Nico J. J. Verdonschot in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Berend W. Schreurs Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten (Dutch Arthroplasty Register), ’s Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
Dept. of Orthopaedics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Berend W. Schreurs in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Rob G. H. H. Nelissen Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten (Dutch Arthroplasty Register), ’s Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
Dept. of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Rob G. H. H. Nelissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

identifies the prosthetic component while the batch number specifies production details. Registration of the product number provides opportunities to expand the information about a specific prosthesis that is provided within the register. Furthermore, the

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
General Orthopaedics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180063
Volume/Issue:
Volume 4: Issue 6
Open access
Christof Berberich Department of Medical Training and Education, Heraeus Medical GmbH, Wehrheim, Germany

Search for other papers by Christof Berberich in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Pablo Sanz-Ruiz Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, General University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by Pablo Sanz-Ruiz in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

cement at the cement–prosthesis and cement–bone interfaces which initially exceeds MIC (minimal inhibitory capacity) values of many bacteria by a factor of 100-fold and more. 12 Significant prolongation of the antibiotic activity in joint fluid

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
General Orthopaedics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180104
Volume/Issue:
Volume 4: Issue 10
Open access
Stavros Tsotsolis Academic Orthopaedic Department, Aristotle University Medical School, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Ring Road Efkarpia, Thessaloniki, Greece
Centre of Orthopaedic and Regenerative Medicine (CORE), Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI)-Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Balkan Center, Buildings A & B, Thessaloniki, Greece
Trauma and Orthopaedics Department, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Stavros Tsotsolis in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Eustathios Kenanidis Academic Orthopaedic Department, Aristotle University Medical School, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Ring Road Efkarpia, Thessaloniki, Greece
Centre of Orthopaedic and Regenerative Medicine (CORE), Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI)-Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Balkan Center, Buildings A & B, Thessaloniki, Greece

Search for other papers by Eustathios Kenanidis in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Vasileios F Pegios Academic Orthopaedic Department, Aristotle University Medical School, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Ring Road Efkarpia, Thessaloniki, Greece
Centre of Orthopaedic and Regenerative Medicine (CORE), Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI)-Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Balkan Center, Buildings A & B, Thessaloniki, Greece

Search for other papers by Vasileios F Pegios in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Michael Potoupnis Academic Orthopaedic Department, Aristotle University Medical School, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Ring Road Efkarpia, Thessaloniki, Greece
Centre of Orthopaedic and Regenerative Medicine (CORE), Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI)-Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Balkan Center, Buildings A & B, Thessaloniki, Greece

Search for other papers by Michael Potoupnis in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Eleftherios Tsiridis Academic Orthopaedic Department, Aristotle University Medical School, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Ring Road Efkarpia, Thessaloniki, Greece
Centre of Orthopaedic and Regenerative Medicine (CORE), Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI)-Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Balkan Center, Buildings A & B, Thessaloniki, Greece

Search for other papers by Eleftherios Tsiridis in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

/A *No PCRs; † includes non-thyroid disease. CS, cohort study; PCR, prosthesis-related complications; PJI, periprosthetic joint infection; RC, retrospective cohort; RO, retrospective observational; TD, thyroid disease; TAA, total ankle arthroplasty

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
General Orthopaedics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-22-0085
Volume/Issue:
Volume 8: Issue 2
Open access
Claus Varnum The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark

Search for other papers by Claus Varnum in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Alma Bečić Pedersen Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

Search for other papers by Alma Bečić Pedersen in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Per Hviid Gundtoft Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

Search for other papers by Per Hviid Gundtoft in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Søren Overgaard The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
Orthopaedic Research Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

Search for other papers by Søren Overgaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

revision of prosthesis) in relation to the time. In some cases a different event can preclude the outcome that is being studied; this is often referred to as a competing event, e.g. if the patients dies this precludes the revision of a THA. 15 In

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
General Orthopaedics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180097
Volume/Issue:
Volume 4: Issue 6
Open access
Brijesh Ayyaswamy Department of Orthopaedics, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackpool, UK

Search for other papers by Brijesh Ayyaswamy in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Bilal Saeed Department of Orthopaedics, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackpool, UK

Search for other papers by Bilal Saeed in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Anoop Anand Department of Orthopaedics, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackpool, UK

Search for other papers by Anoop Anand in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Lai Chan Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK

Search for other papers by Lai Chan in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Vishwanath Shetty Department of Orthopaedics, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackpool, UK

Search for other papers by Vishwanath Shetty in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

, prosthesis type, satisfaction, study aims, key findings, summary, ethics, data collection method, data analysis method and recommendations. Sanderson, Tatt and Higgins 21 identified 86 tools for the purpose of quality assessment and supported their

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
General Orthopaedics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.190008
Volume/Issue:
Volume 4: Issue 9
Open access
Richard N de Steiger Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, SAHMRI, Adelaide, Australia

Search for other papers by Richard N de Steiger in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Brian R Hallstrom Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative University of Michigan, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Search for other papers by Brian R Hallstrom in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Anne Lübbeke Geneva Arthroplasty Registry, Geneva University Hospitals Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4 CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Anne Lübbeke in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Elizabeth W Paxton Surgical Outcomes and Analysis Unit, Kaiser Permanente National Implant Registries 8954 Rio San Diego Drive, Suite, San Diego, California, USA

Search for other papers by Elizabeth W Paxton in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Liza N van Steenbergen Dutch Arthroplasty Register (Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten (LROI)), Bruistensingel 230 | 5232 AD ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Liza N van Steenbergen in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Mark Wilkinson Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, United Kingdom
National Joint Replacement for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, Isle of Man and the States of Guernsey (NJR)

Search for other papers by Mark Wilkinson in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

rates of revision for specific prostheses. Revisions are generally defined in joint registries as a removal or exchange of a prosthesis or part thereof and provide an unambiguous record of a problem with the joint replacement. There are many factors that

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
General Orthopaedics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-22-0058
Volume/Issue:
Volume 8: Issue 1
Open access
Richard N. de Steiger Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, SAHMRI, Adelaide, Australia
School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Australia

Search for other papers by Richard N. de Steiger in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Stephen E. Graves School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Australia

Search for other papers by Stephen E. Graves in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

. Information includes, but is not limited to, age, date and side of surgery, surgeon, type of prosthesis inserted, patient diagnosis, methods of implant fixation, and other information associated with the operation. Additional information is collected at the

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
General Orthopaedics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180071
Volume/Issue:
Volume 4: Issue 6
Open access
Petra Izakovicova HELIOS Klinik Zerbst/Anhalt, Germany

Search for other papers by Petra Izakovicova in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Olivier Borens Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Olivier Borens in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Andrej Trampuz Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Andrej Trampuz in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

mobility in older age, the number of implanted prosthetic joints continues to rise. 2 With a steadily increasing number of implantations, the number of PJI cases also rises continuously. Longer prosthesis indwelling time is associated with a higher

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
General Orthopaedics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180092
Volume/Issue:
Volume 4: Issue 7
Open access
Pierre Hoffmeyer University Hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Pierre Hoffmeyer in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

the superiority of machine-assisted surgery compared to traditional techniques. One exception may be the unicondylar knee prosthesis that seems to benefit from the use of a dedicated robotic device. But, there is a cost to the use of these techniques

Article Type:
Editorial
Category:
General Orthopaedics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-23-0213
Volume/Issue:
Volume 9: Issue 1
Open access
Bart G. Pijls Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Bart G. Pijls in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Jennifer M. T. A. Meessen Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Jennifer M. T. A. Meessen in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Keith Tucker Implant Performance Committee, England and Wales National Joint Registry, ODEP, Beyond Compliance and MHRA Expert Advisory Group for MoM Prostheses, London, UK

Search for other papers by Keith Tucker in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Susanna Stea Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy

Search for other papers by Susanna Stea in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Liza Steenbergen Dutch Arthroplasty Register (Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten, LROI), 's- Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Liza Steenbergen in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Anne Marie Fenstad The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

Search for other papers by Anne Marie Fenstad in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Keijo Mäkelä Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland

Search for other papers by Keijo Mäkelä in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Ioan Cristian Stoica Foisor Orthopaedics Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania

Search for other papers by Ioan Cristian Stoica in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Maxim Goncharov VJRR, Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, St Petersburg, Russia

Search for other papers by Maxim Goncharov in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Søren Overgaard Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

Search for other papers by Søren Overgaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Jorge Arias de la Torre Departament de Salut, Agència de Qualitat i Avaluació Sanitàries de Catalunya (AQuAS), Barcelona, Spain
CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
Instituto de Biomedicina (IBIOMED). Universidad de León, León, Spain

Search for other papers by Jorge Arias de la Torre in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Anne Lübbeke Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by Anne Lübbeke in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Ola Rolfson Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

Search for other papers by Ola Rolfson in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Rob G. H. H. Nelissen Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Rob G. H. H. Nelissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

They can be considered the first generation of metal-on-metal total hip replacement (MOM-THR). Their metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) counterpart was Charnley’s low friction arthroplasty. 1 The Charnley MoP prosthesis had lower rates of early aseptic

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
General Orthopaedics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180078
Volume/Issue:
Volume 4: Issue 6
Open access