Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Izaäk F. Kodde in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jetske Viveen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bertram The in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Roger P. van Riet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Denise Eygendaal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, stiffness, pain, oversizing or overlengthening, dissociation of the prosthesis, erosions of the capitellum and progressive symptomatic osteoarthritis of the ulnohumeral joint. 8 Since this embodies a broad range of complications, with variable (and
Search for other papers by Joshua B.V. Smith in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Habeeb Bishi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chao Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vipin Asopa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Richard E. Field in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David H. Sochart in
Google Scholar
PubMed
that it allows accurate prediction of prosthesis size, shape and position and this enables the aforementioned aims of THA to be achieved. 1 – 7 With a single templating software package, multiple implants from different manufactures can be templated
Search for other papers by E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
review the various prosthetic knee hinge models that have been used since 1975, with the purpose of analysing their indications and results. Table 1. Summary of hinge knee prosthesis designs published in the literature since 1975 Design
Search for other papers by Nuno Sampaio Gomes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
destruction for a reverse prosthesis; c) coronal, and d) transverse view of the pre-operative planning. (From Zimmer-Biomet software; with permission). Fig. 3 a) Sterilised bone model and glenoid guide, with b) one inferior-tilted pin hole for a
Search for other papers by Cheuk Yin Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kenneth Jordan Ng Cheong Chung in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Omar M. E. Ali in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicholas D. H. Chung in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cheuk Heng Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
occurs adjacent to the bone–implant interfaces. This may be followed by prosthesis micromotion and further debris particle dissemination. It is unclear whether these biological processes are solely responsible for the loosening of the joint. Osteolysis
Search for other papers by Jun Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Erhu Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yuan Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
similar trend has been predicted in other national registries ( 3 , 4 , 5 ). Based on these forecasts, knee surgeons have an urgent requirement for evidence-based guidelines for prosthesis options in managing rTKA. The revision procedure usually
Search for other papers by Daniel Bachman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Akin Cil in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction In 2017 there are two most commonly-used elbow arthroplasties: distal humeral replacement or hemi-arthroplasty and total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). Each type of prosthesis has ever-evolving indications and surgical techniques. The
Search for other papers by Geke A. W. Denissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Liza N. van Steenbergen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wouter T. Lollinga in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Nico J. J. Verdonschot in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Dept. of Orthopaedics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Berend W. Schreurs in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Dept. of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Rob G. H. H. Nelissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
identifies the prosthetic component while the batch number specifies production details. Registration of the product number provides opportunities to expand the information about a specific prosthesis that is provided within the register. Furthermore, the
Upper Limb Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Jetske Viveen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Izaak F. Kodde in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andras Heijink in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Koen L. M. Koenraadt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michel P. J. van den Bekerom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Denise Eygendaal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Since the introduction of the radial head prosthesis (RHP) in 1941, 1 many alterations in designs and materials have been proposed and tried that have varied in terms of material, fixation technique, modularity, and polarity
Search for other papers by Farhan Syed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anthony Ugwuoke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
systematic review of a particular brand of ankle prosthesis was discussed, then to avoid duplication, individual studies from that systematic review were not discussed. Indications and prosthesis types In contrast to hip and knee joints, the ankle