Search for other papers by Julia E J W Geilen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI) Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
Search for other papers by Sem M M Hermans in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI) Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
Search for other papers by Ruud Droeghaag in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI) Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
Search for other papers by Martijn G M Schotanus in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Emil H van Haaren in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wouter L W van Hemert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
disadvantages. The most used approaches are the direct anterior approach (DAA), posterior approach (PA), and straight lateral approach (SLA). Each approach can accomplish safe and efficient reconstruction of the joint ( 8 ). DAA is claimed to result in shorter
Search for other papers by Philippe Chiron in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicolas Reina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction In most instances, fractures of the femoral head are the consequence of a high-energy trauma with posterior dislocation of the femoral head. A concomitant fracture of the posterior wall of the acetabulum is frequent. These
Search for other papers by Georgios Kyriakopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lazaros Poultsides in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Panayiotis Christofilopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
significantly higher WOMAC scores. Zhao et al 11 compared 60 DAA with 60 posterior approach (PA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients for a minimum of six months. The DAA group had improved postoperative pain scores, whereas UCLA hip score and HHS were
Search for other papers by Kavin Sundaram in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ahmed Siddiqi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Atul F. Kamath in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carlos A. Higuera-Rueda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
hip arthrodesis, 7 as well as revision hip arthroplasty in patients with abductor deficiency as the modified TSO preserves the posterior capsule and short external rotators. 8 Contrary to TSO, both the ETO and transfemoral osteotomy are the
Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Portugal
Search for other papers by Bruno Direito-Santos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Guilherme França in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jóni Nunes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by André Costa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eurico Bandeira Rodrigues in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A. Pedro Silva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Portugal
Search for other papers by Pedro Varanda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
mostly due to the bone growth on the acetabular posterior wall in its supero-lateral aspect. 11 , 12 AR is an abnormal opening of the acetabulum in the sagittal plane in a posterior direction, with an excessive coverage of the femoral head and
Search for other papers by Javier Pizones in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eduardo García-Rey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
has been the sagittal vertical axis (SVA). 8 The SVA is defined as the length of a horizontal line connecting the posterior superior sacral endplate to a vertical plumbline dropped from the centroid of C7. However, further studies have analysed
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science-DIBINEM, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Search for other papers by Leonardo Tassinari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science-DIBINEM, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Search for other papers by Alberto Di Martino in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science-DIBINEM, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Search for other papers by Matteo Brunello in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science-DIBINEM, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Search for other papers by Valentino Rossomando in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Orthopedics-Traumatology and Prosthetic Surgery and Hip and Knee Revision, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
Search for other papers by Francesco Traina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science-DIBINEM, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Search for other papers by Cesare Faldini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
control LLD and correct component positioning and sizing were compared to answering the following questions: i) Are there any differences in the incidence and size of LLD between DAA, posterior approach (PA) and anterolateral approach (ALA)? ii) Are there
Search for other papers by Yingze Su in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kangming Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jinyan Wu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Junfeng Zhu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xiaodong Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
posterior femoral condyles on the axial plane ( 1 ), which is relatively more accepted, while others define it as the angle between the axis of the femoral neck and the transcondylar axis of the knee on the top view ( 2 ). Similar to the variation in its
Search for other papers by George Grammatopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Moritz Innmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Phan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Russell Bodner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Geert Meermans in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-inclination is the angle between a line tangent to the anterior and posterior edges of the acetabular cup and a horizontal line parallel to the margin of the radiograph ( 48 ). Lumbar lordosis angle (LL) The lumbar lordosis angle is defined by the angle
Search for other papers by Gösta Ullmark in
Google Scholar
PubMed
management of this common complication ( Fig. 3 ). Aetiology Incidence A meta-analysis by Masonis and Bourne 5 involving 13 203 procedures found a dislocation rate of 3.23% after a posterior approach compared with 2.18% after an anterolateral