Search for other papers by Thomas J. Holme in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marta Karbowiak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jennifer Clements in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ritesh Sharma in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johnathan Craik in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Najab Ellahee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
.1 – – Pre 3.1 Post 4.5 – 7% 5% (cup) 6% ARPE Craik (2017) 8 qDASH : 16.8. VAS Satisfaction : 8.7 – – – – 5% 0% 10% ARPE Robles-Molina (2017) 9 qDASH : Pre 74.67 Post 21.79 VAS Pain : Pre 9.3 Post 1
Search for other papers by Keith Tucker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Klaus-Peter Günther in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Per Kjaersgaard-Andersen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jörg Lützner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jan Philippe Kretzer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rob G.H.H. Nelissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Toni Lange in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luigi Zagra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
has been hypothesized that in THA the combination of different implants from different manufacturers can lead to adverse effects. 37 – 40 A typical example of mix & match would be combining an acetabular cup and liner from one company with a stem and