Filter

Refine by date

—

Refine by category

  • Shoulder & Elbow (3)
  • Print
  • Save

Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for :

  • "blood loss" x
  • Shoulder & Elbow x
Clear All
Thomas Kozak Albany Health Campus, Albany, Australia
Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia

Search for other papers by Thomas Kozak in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Stefan Bauer Ensemble Hospitalier de la Côte, Morges, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Stefan Bauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Gilles Walch Hôpital Privé Jean-Mermoz, Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France

Search for other papers by Gilles Walch in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Saad Al-karawi Albany Health Campus, Albany, Australia

Search for other papers by Saad Al-karawi in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
William Blakeney Albany Health Campus, Albany, Australia
Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia

Search for other papers by William Blakeney in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

blood loss (292 ± 118 versus 492 ± 334 mL). The rate of intraoperative complications was significantly lower in the retention group (0% versus 15%). Patients with retention also had improved postoperative range of motion (active external rotation, 26

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
Shoulder & Elbow
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.200085
Volume/Issue:
Volume 6: Issue 3
Open access
Ulas Can Kolac Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

Search for other papers by Ulas Can Kolac in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Alp Paksoy Charité University Hospital, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Alp Paksoy in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Doruk Akgün Charité University Hospital, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Doruk Akgün in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

, less blood loss, and fewer fluoroscopic images than the conventional method ( 69 ). Both virtual surgical and 3D printing groups demonstrated better functional outcomes than the conventional group ( 69 ). However, the virtual surgical method proved more

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
Shoulder & Elbow
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-23-0200
Volume/Issue:
Volume 9: Issue 6
Open access
Joost I.P. Willems Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Joost I.P. Willems in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Jim Hoffmann Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Jim Hoffmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Inger N. Sierevelt Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
Xpert Orthopedics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Inger N. Sierevelt in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Michel P.J. van den Bekerom Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Michel P.J. van den Bekerom in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Tjarco D.W. Alta Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Tjarco D.W. Alta in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Arthur van Noort Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Arthur van Noort in
Google Scholar
PubMed Close

a revision, 7 shorter operating time 8 , 9 and lower amount of blood loss. 9 Its popularity is confirmed by a recent market analysis which projected that the number of stemless implants will surpass conventional stemmed arthroplasty in

Article Type:
Review Article
Category:
Shoulder & Elbow
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.200067
Volume/Issue:
Volume 6: Issue 1
Open access