Search for other papers by Andrea Angelini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ivan Bohacek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mihovil Plecko in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carlo Biz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Giulia Trovarelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mariachiara Cerchiaro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Giuseppe Di Rubbo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pietro Ruggieri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
reconstruction’, ‘Resection of the distal fibula and soft tissue reconstruction’, ‘Resection of the distal fibula and bone reconstruction’, and ‘Resection of the distal fibula and reconstruction with arthrodesis, arthroplasty, or other options’ groups. Figure
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Catalin Cirstoiu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Bogdan Cretu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Bogdan Serban in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Zsombor Panti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Mihai Nica in
Google Scholar
PubMed
reconstruction; bone transport; arthrodesis; and rotationplasty. Although each one of these reconstruction possibilities carries its own benefits and disadvantages, they all have to obey a minimum set of requirements and the choice between them has to be made on
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Catalin Cirstoiu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Bogdan Cretu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Sergiu Iordache in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Mihnea Popa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Bogdan Serban in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Adrian Cursaru in
Google Scholar
PubMed
prosthesis Preventive osteosynthesis ± PMMA Osteosynthesis ± PMMA Resection arthrodesis Resection arthrodesis Resection arthrodesis Proximal tibia Resection–reconstruction with modular prosthesis Preventive osteosynthesis ± PMMA
Search for other papers by Joaquim Soares do Brito in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by André Spranger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paulo Almeida in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by José Portela in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Irene Barrientos-Ruiz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
% ∅ Saikia et al 26 Wide resection (en bloc) and knee arthrodesis with dual fibulae plus cancellous bone graft plus 95° condylar blade plate 3.1% (1 patient) NF 1 patient (treated with an above-knee amputation due to local recurrence with
Search for other papers by Olga D. Savvidou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Panagiotis Koutsouradis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by George D. Chloros in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ioannis Papanastasiou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thomas Sarlikiotis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aggelos Kaspiris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Panayiotis J. Papagelopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, resection arthroplasty, interposition arthroplasty, arthrodesis, elbow osteoarticular allograft reconstruction, or allograft-prosthesis composite arthroplasty and vascularized fibular grafts. 43 , 76 , 84 There is limited literature supporting the
Search for other papers by Ajay Puri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
complications. 26 As mentioned earlier, the pelvis and the proximal femur are the most common sites involved in chondrosarcoma. Pelvic periacetabular resections in children are best managed with pseudarthrosis, though an iliofemoral arthrodesis and
These authors contributed equally to this manuscript
Search for other papers by Olga Savvidou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
These authors contributed equally to this manuscript
Search for other papers by Olympia Papakonstantinou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
These authors contributed equally to this manuscript
Search for other papers by Eleftheria Lakiotaki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ioannis Zafeiris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dimitra Melissaridou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Co-senior authors
Search for other papers by Pinelopi Korkolopoulou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Co-senior authors
Search for other papers by Panayiotis J. Papagelopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
followed by reimplantation or resection arthrodesis could be the alternative methods of surgical reconstruction. Both methods have been found to result in a reasonable functional outcome even in later stages of the disease. 35 The technique of hemicortical