Search for other papers by Robert Grimer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael Parry in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Steven James in
Google Scholar
PubMed
or distance from a sarcoma center . J Surg Oncol 2013 ; 108 : 477 – 480 . 8. Kang S Han I Lee SA Cho HS Kim HS . Unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcoma: the impact of the referring hospital
Search for other papers by Andrew J Harrison in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael R Redler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David M Taylor in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ansar Mahmood in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by John T Jones in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yukihiro Arai in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yoshinobu Watanabe in
Google Scholar
PubMed
can be challenging for clinicians and devastating for patients. The time required for the healing of fresh fractures can have a serious economic impact for the patient. In the 5% of patients who go on to non-union, that economic impact can increase
Search for other papers by Ulas Can Kolac in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alp Paksoy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Doruk Akgün in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of integrating 3D planning, navigation, PSI, AR, and MR technologies in shoulder arthroplasty for achieving precise implant positioning and to assess their potential benefits in
Search for other papers by Pierre J. Hoffmeyer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
within the first few months of publication, aiming to secure inclusion in their database. Later, it will be submitted for indexing to Web of Science with a view to obtaining an Impact Factor. There will be an annual paper edition of EFORT Open Reviews
Search for other papers by Clemens Clar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lukas Leitner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Amir Koutp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Georg Hauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laura Rasic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andreas Leithner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Patrick Sadoghi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
might have a major impact on the outcome. Comparing Emilia-Romagna with Denmark, it is also noticeable that Emilia-Romagna has a superior long-term outcome, although cementless fixation dominates in both countries. An age-related difference as a revision
Search for other papers by Alessio Bernasconi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by François Lintz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francesco Sadile in
Google Scholar
PubMed
the subtalar joint without blocking it. 47 The concept of ‘manipulation’ of the subtalar joint in approaching flatfoot was firstly reported in 1946 by Chambers, 48 who described the impaction of a wedge-shaped bone block into the anterior
School of Medicine, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
Search for other papers by Mario Herrera-Pérez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pablo Martín-Vélez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
School of Medicine, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
Search for other papers by David González-Martín in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Miguel Domínguez-Meléndez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ahmed E Galhoum in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Victor Valderrabano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
School of Medicine, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
Search for other papers by Sergio Tejero in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Status Classification (ASA Classification). ASA 1 Healthy patient without organic, biochemical or psychiatric disease. ASA 2 A patient with mild systemic disease. No significant impact on daily activity. Unlikely impact on anaesthesia
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for other papers by Gautier Beckers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Clinique Orthopédique Duval, Laval, Quebec, Canada
Search for other papers by Marc-Olivier Kiss in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Clinique Orthopédique Duval, Laval, Quebec, Canada
Search for other papers by Vincent Massé in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Knee Surgery, Casa di Cura Solatrix, Rovereto, TN, Italy
Search for other papers by Michele Malavolta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Clinique Orthopédique Duval, Laval, Quebec, Canada
Search for other papers by Pascal-André Vendittoli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
determining the most suitable treatment strategy. Wolff et al. ( 23 ) described two critical factors that come into play: the severity of the deformity and its proximity to the joint line. The closer the deformity is to the joint, the greater its impact on
Search for other papers by Louis Dagneaux in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julien Bourlez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Benjamin Degeorge in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by François Canovas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
cautious, forbidding the practice of high-impact physical activities in order to prevent premature failure of implants. Such caution is nowadays being questioned, given the increasing functional demands desired by patients themselves, and with recent data
Search for other papers by Hee-Nee Pang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stephen Petis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Douglas D. R. Naudie in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Steven J. MacDonald in
Google Scholar
PubMed
no impact on treatment success. 29 , 30 A sub-group analysis by Choi et al determined that prosthesis retention was successful in 10 of 19 (53%) knees treated with IDPE versus zero of 13 knees treated with an IDPE. 27 MRSA infection in
