Search for other papers by Xavier Crevoisier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mathieu Assal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Katarina Stanekova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
rates. Pre-operative assessment requires careful clinical examination of the foot and ankle as well as of the lower limbs, weight-bearing radiographs of the ankle and CT scans. Implantation planning can be performed on radiographs or on a CT scan using
Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Search for other papers by Signe Steenstrup Jensen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Niels Martin Jensen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Per Hviid Gundtoft in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Søren Kold in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Robert Zura in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Search for other papers by Bjarke Viberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, surgical procedures, follow-up time, and risk factors as defined by the study. Risk of bias assessment Only those studies included in the meta-analyses were assessed for risk of bias. The studies were assessed by two authors (S S and N J) in
Search for other papers by Felix Kurt Massen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Seth Shoap in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J Turner Vosseller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Weija Fan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by John Usseglio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wolfgang Boecker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sebastian Felix Baumbach in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hans Polzer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
repair of the Achilles tendon rupture Comparison At least two different postoperative treatment protocols Outcomes Patient satisfaction, patient reported outcome measures, functional assessment, time to return to work/sports, tendon
School of Health Sciences and Physiotherapy, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
Search for other papers by Myles C Murphy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Neurophysiology Research Laboratory, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Centre for Human Performance, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
Search for other papers by Christopher Latella in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Australian Ballet, Southbank, Victoria, Australia
Victorian Institute of Sport, Albert Park Victoria, Australia
Search for other papers by Ebonie K Rio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Neurophysiology Research Laboratory, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Centre for Human Performance, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
Search for other papers by Janet L Taylor in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stephanie Martino in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Colin Sylvester in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by William Hale in
Google Scholar
PubMed
La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
Search for other papers by Andrea B Mosler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
controls. Outcomes The primary outcome for this review was the assessment of measures that assess aspects of descending motor drive. We included studies that reported any measure inclusive of cervicomedullary evoked potentials (CMEP), ICF, motor
Search for other papers by John-Henry Rhind in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eamon Ramhamadany in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ruaraidh Collins in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Siddharth Govilkar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Debashis Dass in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stuart Hay in
Google Scholar
PubMed
encourages video or telephone consultation follow up, rather than a face-to-face clinical appointment. Patient-led follow up rather than formal booked appointments at this time is preferable. We thus suggest at this initial virtual assessment point deciding
Search for other papers by Brijesh Ayyaswamy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bilal Saeed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anoop Anand in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lai Chan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vishwanath Shetty in
Google Scholar
PubMed
reasons All relevant studies (all designs) before October 2017 Outcome: Quality of life assessed (either by standard tool or descriptive analysis) No assessment of quality of life after amputation Studies in English language or
Search for other papers by Michaël Moeri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dominique A. Rothenfluh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christoph J. Laux in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, UK
Search for other papers by Dennis E. Dominguez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
search and added if appropriate. We selected articles containing relevant information to answer the three most common questions when encountering a suspected C-spine injury in blunt trauma patients in the ED: Who needs radiological assessment before C
Search for other papers by F T Spindler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by V Herterich in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by B M Holzapfel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by W Böcker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H Polzer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S F Baumbach in
Google Scholar
PubMed
possible, data conversion was performed according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook ( 17 ). Risk of bias assessment The level of evidence of each study was assessed according to the recommendations of Wright et al. ( 18 ). The
Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
South West of London Orthopaedic Elective Centre, Epsom, UK
Search for other papers by Nicholas D. Clement in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marwan Al-Zibari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Irrum Afzal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David J. Deehan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Deiary Kader in
Google Scholar
PubMed
studies. Secondary objectives included presenting the demographic data as well as the type of robots and implants used across the included articles. Quality assessment All studies were quality assessed by two authors (NDC and MA) using the NIH
Search for other papers by George Grammatopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Moritz Innmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Phan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Russell Bodner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Geert Meermans in
Google Scholar
PubMed
others ( 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ). Furthermore, a large number or patients with cup orientations outside these boundaries do not exhibit hip instability ( 8 , 9 , 10 ). The interaction between the hip and spine and the assessment of the sagittal plane