Osteoarticular Surgery Research, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research – IdiPAZ (La Paz University Hospital – Autonomous University of Madrid), Madrid, Spain
Search for other papers by E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hortensia De la Corte-Rodríguez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carlos A. Encinas-Ullán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Primitivo Gómez-Cardero in
Google Scholar
PubMed
to work at their highest level (18 vs. 12 months), although the time to return to their highest level of activity was similar. ROM (134 vs. 127 degrees), pain intensity (2.2 vs. 1.7), and Lysholm scores (86.3 vs. 90) were similar in both groups at the
Search for other papers by Manuel Saavedra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
AO Foundation, PAEG Expert Group, Davos, Switzerland
Hospital Base de Valdivia, Valdivia, Chile
Search for other papers by Matías Sepúlveda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
Hospital Clínico Mutual de Seguridad, Santiago, Chile
Search for other papers by María Jesús Tuca in
Google Scholar
PubMed
AO Foundation, PAEG Expert Group, Davos, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Estefanía Birrer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
six weeks postoperatively. Physical therapy begins after two weeks postoperatively and return to sports depends on the patient’s movement and strength recovery, usually after 12 weeks. In younger patients, under the age of 6 years, a straight knee
Rehasport Clinic, Poznań, Poland
Department of Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Hand Surgery, University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
Search for other papers by Przemysław Lubiatowski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Rehasport Clinic, Poznań, Poland
Department of Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Hand Surgery, University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
Search for other papers by Joanna Wałecka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marcin Dzianach in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Rehasport Clinic, Poznań, Poland
Department of Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Hand Surgery, University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
Search for other papers by Jakub Stefaniak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Leszek Romanowski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
report, level IV 3 18, 29, 48 2 1 Arthroscopic Anterior RCJ Arthroscopic 3 100% - Resolution of symptoms (up to 13 m FU), - return to normal activity (including sports) - Chondromalacia in RCJ (‘kissing lesion’ with plica) - No
Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Alexandre Lädermann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jérome Tirefort in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Davide Zanchi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Affidea Centre de Diagnostic Radiologique de Carouge CDRC, Geneva, Switzerland
Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden
Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany
Search for other papers by Sven Haller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Medical Research Department, Artanim Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Caecilia Charbonnier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pierre Hoffmeyer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gregory Cunningham in
Google Scholar
PubMed
1999 ; 4 ( 4 ): 187 - 195 . 58. Kvist J Ek A Sporrstedt K Good L . Fear of re-injury: a hindrance for returning to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, UK
Search for other papers by Vikki Wylde in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Neil Artz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nick Howells in
Google Scholar
PubMed
National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, UK
North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
Search for other papers by Ashley W. Blom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
from their operation than pain relief and improvement in basic mobility. 2 This includes a return to important higher function activities, such as kneeling. 1 – 3 The majority of patients expect to be able to kneel after TKR, 2 , 4 , 5
Search for other papers by James R. Berstock in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by James R. Murray in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael R. Whitehouse in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ashley W. Blom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrew D. Beswick in
Google Scholar
PubMed
in time to regain an active straight leg raise following the subvastus approach has emerged. Each of the nine studies reporting time to regain an active straight leg raise suggest a benefit in favour of the subvastus approach. The difference in return
Search for other papers by Alp Paksoy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Doruk Akgün in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sebastian Lappen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philipp Moroder in
Google Scholar
PubMed
athroscopic posterior labral repair can lead to a good clinical outcome and a return to sports ( 50 ) ( Fig. 6 ), irrespective of the fixation technique with hard body or all-suture anchors ( 58 ). However, the presence of posterior glenoid bone loss >11
Search for other papers by Daniel J. McCormack in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Darren Puttock in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Steven P. Godsiff in
Google Scholar
PubMed
activity levels, once thought to be detrimental to patients undergoing UKR, have since been found to be beneficial in terms of implant survivorship and revision rates. 4 Patients also have higher rates of returning to sporting activities, particularly
Search for other papers by Abdul-ilah Hachem in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andres Molina-Creixell in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xavier Rius in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Karla Rodriguez-Bascones in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francisco Javier Cabo Cabo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jose Luis Agulló in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Miguel Angel Ruiz-Iban in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Isolated posterior instability is reported as being the least common of all glenohumeral instabilities, representing from 2 to 10% of all cases ( 1 , 2 ). In certain demographic groups, such as athletes in contact sports, rowers
Search for other papers by Helen Anwander in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philipp Vetter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christophe Kurze in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan, Republic of China
Search for other papers by Chui J Farn in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fabian G Krause in
Google Scholar
PubMed
studies with only a short-time follow-up was to exclude papers of low quality. However, we did include studies with level of evidence I–IV and low methodological quality. The rationale to not conduct a level I meta-analysis is based on the available