Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for other papers by Charles Rivière in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford, UK
Search for other papers by William Jackson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for other papers by Loïc Villet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
South-West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, UK
Search for other papers by Sivan Sivaloganathan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Shamir Medical Center, Zriffin, Israel
Search for other papers by Yaron Barziv in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Département de Chirurgie, Université de Montréal, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, Québec, Canada
Search for other papers by Pascal-André Vendittoli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction The Kinematic Alignment (KA) technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an alternative surgical technique aiming to resurface knee articular surfaces. 1 , 2 Ultimately, the goal of KA is to alter the knee physiological
Search for other papers by Charles Rivière in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefan Lazic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Oliver Boughton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yann Wiart in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Loic Vïllet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Justin Cobb in
Google Scholar
PubMed
alignment techniques) for knee implant positioning ( Fig. 1 ) and to summarize the evidence behind each one. Fig. 1 Different techniques for aligning total knee arthroplasty implants on a patient with 6° constitutional varus limb alignment. From left
Search for other papers by Stein J. Janssen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Iris van Oost in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefan J.M. Breugem in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rutger C.I. van Geenen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Suggested advantages of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) over total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are more natural knee kinematics, greater range of motion, lower complication and mortality rates, higher satisfaction, faster
Search for other papers by Gareth G. Jones in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Susannah Clarke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Jaere in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Justin Cobb in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) offers a number of advantages compared with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is associated with a shorter length of stay, a more physiological gait, higher outcome scores and significantly lower rates of venous
Search for other papers by Francesco Benazzo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefano M.P. Rossi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alberto Combi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sanjay Meena in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matteo Ghiara in
Google Scholar
PubMed
healing with residual deformity, influencing the axis. According to the extent of deformity, it is necessary to evaluate possible correction implant ( Fig. 3 a , b ), corrective osteotomy and/or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (one or two steps). Deschamps
Search for other papers by Paolo Salari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrea Baldini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is a challenging procedure and is usually associated with worse results when compared with primary knee arthroplasty. 1 In this scenario, surgeons have to deal with different technical
Search for other papers by Maria Beatriz Quaresma in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by José Portela in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joaquim Soares do Brito in
Google Scholar
PubMed
/open synovectomy 12 arthroscopic synovectomy 83.3% Note . DVT, deep venous thrombosis; KSS, Knee Society Score; NR, not reported; TKA, total knee arthroplasty. Primary outcomes Local recurrence Akinci et al observed a group
Search for other papers by Fahima A. Begum in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Babar Kayani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Samuel D. J. Morgan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Syed S. Ahmed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sandeep Singh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fares S. Haddad in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, and surgical instrumentation in order to improve the outcomes and the efficiency of the procedure. 3 – 8 Advantages of UKA over total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include reduced operative time, decreased intraoperative blood loss, reduced
Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Yvet Mooiweer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lina Roling in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Margaret Vugrin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Chair of Medical Sociology, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR) Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Oldenburg, Germany
Search for other papers by Lena Ansmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Stevens in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Hospital of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery Pius-Hospital, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
Search for other papers by Gesine H Seeber in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are amongst the most frequently performed orthopedic surgeries ( 1 ). Around 160 000 primary THAs and 125 000 primary TKAs were performed in Germany in 2019 ( 2
Search for other papers by Nuno Sampaio Gomes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. Clear advantages in total knee arthroplasty are the fact that it is very intuitive and effective in placing the components in the desired position, it is attractive to patients because they like a personalised patient-care approach and it increases
