Search for other papers by Helen Anwander in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philipp Vetter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christophe Kurze in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan, Republic of China
Search for other papers by Chui J Farn in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fabian G Krause in
Google Scholar
PubMed
://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B9.35292 ) 57. Bai L Guan S Liu S You T Xie X Chen P Zhang W . Clinical outcomes of osteochondral lesions of the talus with large subchondral cysts treated with osteotomy and autologous chondral grafts: minimum 2
Search for other papers by Victor Lu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maria Tennyson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrew Zhou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ravi Patel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mary D Fortune in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Azeem Thahir in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matija Krkovic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
%) pronation–abduction N/A N/A Amirfeyz et al. (24) ACE retrograde locked intramedullary humeral nail and VersaNail Humeral Universal Nailing System N/A No N/A AO/OTA classification: 44B2, 44B3, or 44C N/A N/A Armstrong et al
Institut du mouvement et de l’appareil locomoteur, Marseille, France
Search for other papers by Ahmed Mabrouk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jae-Sung An in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kristian Kley in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Komal Tapasvi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sachin Tapasvi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matthieu Ollivier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
ankle centres. Figure 2 Preoperative CT scan. (A) and (B) Coronal, (C) sagittal, and (D) axial cuts show medial femoral condyle cartilage defect. Figure 3 Preoperative MRI scan. (A) Coronal. (B) coronal. Show cartilage defect
Search for other papers by Dimitrios A. Flevas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Panayiotis D. Megaloikonomos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Leonidas Dimopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Evanthia Mitsiokapa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Panayiotis Koulouvaris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andreas F. Mavrogenis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
recommended agents (Grade 2B and 2C when it comes to adjusted-dose VKA or aspirin). 31 When LMWH is used for VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing THR or TKR, the administration is recommended to start either 12 hours or more pre-operatively or 12 hours
Search for other papers by Karl Stoffel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christoph Sommer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mark Lee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tracy Y Zhu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Karsten Schwieger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christopher Finkemeier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Dugan et al. (27) Retrospective 14 (15 fractures) C2 ( n = 7), C3 ( n = 8): All open fractures due to high trauma; 10 Gustillo Anderson Classification grade 3a, 5 grade 3b; Mean bone defect: 8 cm (range 2.2–11.7 cm) NR Thorough open
Search for other papers by Ilkka J. Helenius in
Google Scholar
PubMed
associated with fused ribs 15 , 16 ( Figs 4a and 4b ). Campbell et al 16 evaluated the outcomes of 27 patients with congenital scoliosis associated with fused ribs who underwent an opening-wedge thoracotomy and VEPTR implantation at the age of 3.2
Search for other papers by Maciej Otworowski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dariusz Grzelecki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Krzysztof Starszak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrzej Boszczyk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mateusz Piorunek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Trauma and Orthopedics Department, Centre of Posgraduate Medical Education, Otwock, Poland
Search for other papers by Bartłomiej Kordasiewicz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
shoulder fractures ( Fig. 2 , 3 , 4, and 5 ). Figure 2 Wright and Cofield classification. It divides periprosthetic fractures into three types. Type A – fracture located near the tip of the stem. Extending proximally. Type B – fracture located
These authors contributed equally to this work
Search for other papers by Heri Suroto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Cell & Tissue Bank-Regenerative Medicine Centre, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
These authors contributed equally to this work
Search for other papers by Brigita De Vega in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fani Deapsari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tabita Prajasari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pramono Ari Wibowo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Steven K. Samijo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
( Fig. 2a ). 23 Whereas, five non-RCT studies were assessed using ROBINS-I ( Fig. 2b ), of which four studies indicated a moderate risk of bias, 25 – 28 and one study had a high risk of bias 24 due to confounding. The distinct age gap was determined
Search for other papers by Charles Court in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Leonard Chatelain in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Barthelemy Valteau in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Charlie Bouthors in
Google Scholar
PubMed
= partial fracture with no instability including transverse fracture of the sacrum below S2; type B = fracture with horizontal instability; type C = fracture with vertical instability. In type B, the vertical opening of the posterior lesion can occur at the
Search for other papers by Maurizio De Pellegrin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lucrezia Montanari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Desiree Moharamzadeh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Oliver Eberhardt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
treatment in Figure 3B . Table 1. Intra-observer statistical analysis according to Cohen and k values in Tests 1 and 2. Test 2 has an excellent concordance ECHOGENICITY Test Operator Cohen’s coefficient 1 A