Academic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, LGI, University of Leeds, UK
Search for other papers by Emmanuele Santolini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nikolaos K. Kanakaris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Center, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
Search for other papers by Peter V. Giannoudis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
minimally invasive or percutaneous techniques 60 , 73 , 86 but rising to up to 50% with open lumbopelvic fixation, and up to 20% if treated with plates); 74 , 95 wound healing problems; 93 , 96 , 97 instrumentation failure (11–17%); 85
Search for other papers by Richard N de Steiger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Brian R Hallstrom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anne Lübbeke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elizabeth W Paxton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Liza N van Steenbergen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
National Joint Replacement for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, Isle of Man and the States of Guernsey (NJR)
Search for other papers by Mark Wilkinson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
rates of revision for specific prostheses. Revisions are generally defined in joint registries as a removal or exchange of a prosthesis or part thereof and provide an unambiguous record of a problem with the joint replacement. There are many factors that
Search for other papers by Bryant Ho in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Judith Baumhauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction An estimated 40% of the United States population have foot problems. 1 Of all patients aged over 50 years, 2.5% report degenerative arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint, termed ‘hallux rigidus’. First MTP
Search for other papers by Carlos A. Encinas-Ullán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
and possible wound healing problems) and a faster recovery. Also, it helps avoid revision surgery, reducing bone loss and mechanical problems. Arthroscopic debridement can be considered in a small number of patients who meet the following criteria
Search for other papers by David Lin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alexander Charalambous in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sammy A. Hanna in
Google Scholar
PubMed
rheumatology advice as they have been shown to increase the risk of wound breakdown. 3 Our review revealed only one case of superficial wound infection post-operatively. Although the overall rate is low (0.9%), wound problems can threaten the underlying
Search for other papers by Maurizio Calcagni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thomas Giesen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-significant differences was not possible. Despite this, we found that some general conclusions were possible. In terms of complications, it appears that the risk of deep infection is small, as we found only two cases (0.5%). Instability seems to be the main problem with
Search for other papers by Markus S. Hanke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Till D. Lerch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Florian Schmaranzer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Malin K. Meier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simon D. Steppacher in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Klaus A. Siebenrock in
Google Scholar
PubMed
repair. 53 The ideal treatment of borderline developmental dysplastic hip (BDDH) is currently a subject of controversy. It is paramount to understand the underlining problem of the individual hip and distinguish instability (dysplasia) from FAI as
Search for other papers by Joost I.P. Willems in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jim Hoffmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Xpert Orthopedics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Inger N. Sierevelt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michel P.J. van den Bekerom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tjarco D.W. Alta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Arthur van Noort in
Google Scholar
PubMed
design of the taper (male or female) or collar (open, solid or absent) and the implantation technique (impaction or screw in). Stemless arthroplasty arose from the desire to avoid stem-related problems such as intraoperative fracture, loosening, stress
Search for other papers by K Venkatadass in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by V Durga Prasad in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nasser Mohammed Mansor Al Ahmadi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S Rajasekaran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Surgical correction of idiopathic developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is one of the most challenging problems in pediatric orthopedic surgery. The treatment goal is to achieve a stable, congruent and concentric hip joint as
Search for other papers by Vinzenz Auersperg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Computed Tomography Research Group, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Wels, Austria
Search for other papers by Klemens Trieb in
Google Scholar
PubMed
of periosteal cells is induced. 24 The fixed action of screws or implants in osteoporotic bone is a biomechanical problem. Different techniques such as bone impaction, angular stable plates, coatings or cement augmentation have been tried to