Search for other papers by Emilio Calvo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by María Valencia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antonio Maria Foruria in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Juan Aguilar Gonzalez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
challenging situation. Since it is a non-anatomic technique, subsequent revision surgery can be seriously compromised not only by scar tissue obscuring normal tissue planes but also by alterations of anatomic stabilizing structures. Furthermore, the number of
Search for other papers by May Fong Mak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Richard Stern in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mathieu Assal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
stability. 20 There is increasing awareness of this fact and more consideration is given to fixing posterior malleolar fractures regardless of size or displacement for direct posterior stabilization of the syndesmosis. An anatomically fixed posterior
Search for other papers by John Edwin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shahbaz Ahmed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shobhit Verma in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Graham Tytherleigh-Strong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Karthik Karuppaiah in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joydeep Sinha in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, traumatic structural; Type II, atraumatic structural; and Type III, muscle patterning (neuromuscular). The treatment for Type I injuries has been discussed above. Type II may rarely require stabilization and Type III injuries are almost always treated with
Search for other papers by Philipp Schleicher in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andreas Pingel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Frank Kandziora in
Google Scholar
PubMed
dislocation prior to posterior surgical stabilization of the occipital-atlanto-axial joint complex presence of any neurological deficit, which might be caused by cerebral hypoperfusion. The diagnostic value of CT-angiography and MR
TraumaEvidence @ German Society for Trauma Surgery, Berlin, Germany
Search for other papers by Martin C Jordan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Konrad F Fuchs in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Steven C Herath in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Search for other papers by Joachim Windolf in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rainer H Meffert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Search for other papers by Anne Neubert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
fixation alone to inadequately stabilize APC II injuries. Therefore, they predominately prefer additional posterior fixation using a sacroiliac screw (SP + SIS). The present systematic literature review investigates both treatment options for APC II
Search for other papers by Kaustubh Ahuja in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Syed Ifthekar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Samarth Mittal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gagandeep Yadav in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bhaskar Sarkar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pankaj Kandwal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Spinal instability constitutes an important indication for surgical stabilization in a number of spinal pathologies. Since the time of the description of the ‘middle path regime’ by Tuli in 1975, spinal instability has constituted
Search for other papers by Hao-Ran Xu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yong-Hui Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yi-Li Zheng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
) Interpretations Scale Duration Sample size Group number Effect P 1 P 2 Heterogeneity I 2 Quality of evidence Effect size Other Owen et al . ( 5 ) Stabilization vs no treatment
These authors contributed equally to the article and should all be considered first authors
Search for other papers by Diana Cabral Teixeira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
These authors contributed equally to the article and should all be considered first authors
Search for other papers by Luís Alves in
Google Scholar
PubMed
These authors contributed equally to the article and should all be considered first authors
Search for other papers by Manuel Gutierres in
Google Scholar
PubMed
thorax) during arm elevation is upward rotation, posterior tilting, and external rotation. 5 The coordination of shoulder joints depends on the pattern of muscular activation. The scapula must be dynamically stabilized in a retracted position during
Search for other papers by Benjamín Cancino in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Hospital Base de Valdivia, Valdivia, Chile
Search for other papers by Matías Sepúlveda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile
Search for other papers by Estefanía Birrer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
injuries were non-accidental. Anatomy The ankle joint is made up of the distal portions of the tibia and the fibula, which form a mortise where the superior aspect of the talus articulates, stabilized by the ligament complexes of the
Search for other papers by Geke A. W. Denissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Liza N. van Steenbergen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wouter T. Lollinga in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Nico J. J. Verdonschot in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Dept. of Orthopaedics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Berend W. Schreurs in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Dept. of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Rob G. H. H. Nelissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
products. Second, the effect of certain implant characteristics across different implants (e.g. polished tapered hip stems, posterior stabilized knees etc.) can only be analysed with a clear-cut succinct definition of these implant characteristics. For that
