Search for other papers by Olivier Guyen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, the liner extends beyond a hemisphere with polyethylene extended around the rim and with an inner diameter of the opening that is smaller than the prosthetic head. Reduction of the head within the liner is achieved through mechanical expansion of the
Search for other papers by Maria A. Smolle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dimosthenis Andreou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Per-Ulf Tunn in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andreas Leithner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. Literature research was performed until 10 June 2018. The following search-terms were used to identify studies on advances in tumour endoprostheses: advances tumour endoprostheses, tumour endoprosthesis, tumour megaprosthesis, prosthetic reconstruction AND
Search for other papers by Paul L Rodham in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vasileios P Giannoudis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Search for other papers by Nikolaos K Kanakaris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Peter V Giannoudis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
and healing in high-risk fractures such as peri-prosthetic femoral fractures, or in improving the biological activity of an atrophic non-union ( 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ). Irrespective of the aim, successful healing with bone grafts can be considered using
Osteoarticular Surgery Research, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research – IdiPAZ (La Paz University Hospital – Autonomous University of Madrid), Madrid, Spain
Search for other papers by E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. , predicting the size of prosthetic components for each patient before implanting TKA is crucial for avoiding the excessive costs associated with additional surgical trays and the morbidity associated with imperfect sizing ( 10 ). Kunze et al. demonstrated
Search for other papers by Gösta Ullmark in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, malunion or a failed hip arthroplasty and eleven times increased for prosthetic instability. The national Swedish Hip Register 6 has reported an increasing risk for dislocation leading to revision surgery after repeated hip surgery. Dislocation
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for other papers by Charles Rivière in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford, UK
Search for other papers by William Jackson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for other papers by Loïc Villet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
South-West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, UK
Search for other papers by Sivan Sivaloganathan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Shamir Medical Center, Zriffin, Israel
Search for other papers by Yaron Barziv in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Département de Chirurgie, Université de Montréal, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, Québec, Canada
Search for other papers by Pascal-André Vendittoli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
’ extreme anatomy with KA (unrestricted) could carry the risk of generating potentially suboptimal prosthetic kinetics 6 with subsequent complications (accelerated polyethylene wear and/or implant loosening). On the other hand, such fear remains without
Search for other papers by Carlos A. Encinas-Ullán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
infection, instability, poor position of the prosthetic components and soft-tissue impingement. Patellar clunk syndrome (PCS) has traditionally been associated with posterior-stabilised (PS) implants. PCS typically occurs within the first year after
Search for other papers by Philip F. Dobson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael R. Reed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
with a three-fold mortality rate at one year. The overall incidence of SSI following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is between 0.2% and 2.2% 2 and rates of deep or peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in THA and primary total knee
Search for other papers by Charles Rivière in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefan Lazic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Oliver Boughton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yann Wiart in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Loic Vïllet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Justin Cobb in
Google Scholar
PubMed
femur and tibia in the frontal plane. 11 , 12 This systematic positioning, the MA technique, does not take into account patient-specific knee anatomy and generated a similar biomechanically-friendly but non-physiological prosthetic knee geometry for
Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Lombardy, Italy
Search for other papers by Francesco Benazzo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Loris Perticarini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eugenio Jannelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alessandro Ivone in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matteo Ghiara in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
the sides involved. In other words, each prosthetic design has only one type of femoral flange (‘more or less patella friendly’) where very different types of patella should adapt. Resurfacing the patella allows to play with the position of the
