Search for other papers by Feng Xie in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shuya Sheng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jeya Palan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hemant G Pandit in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful surgeries performed today and has been described as the ‘operation of the century’ ( 1 , 2 ). However, THA can impose significant limitations on returning to high
Search for other papers by Richard N de Steiger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Brian R Hallstrom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anne Lübbeke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elizabeth W Paxton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Liza N van Steenbergen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
National Joint Replacement for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, Isle of Man and the States of Guernsey (NJR)
Search for other papers by Mark Wilkinson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. Prosthesis outcomes have received closer attention following the high rate of revision and subsequent recall of the ASR Hip Resurfacing System and ASRXL Acetabular System. Over 93 000 patients were implanted with these prostheses and the outcome of these was
Search for other papers by Allan Roy Sekeitto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nkhodiseni Sikhauli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dick Ronald van der Jagt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lipalo Mokete in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jurek R.T. Pietrzak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. Acta Orthop 2017 ; 88 : 383 – 389 . 47. de Vries LMA Neve WC Steens J . Prosthesis retention after an infected hip prosthesis: hip fractures versus primary total hip prosthesis, data from 1998–2015 . J Bone Jt
Search for other papers by J R W Crutsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M C Koper in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J Jelsma in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Heymans in
Google Scholar
PubMed
School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
Search for other papers by I C Heyligers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by B Grimm in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N M C Mathijssen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
School of Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
Search for other papers by M G M Schotanus in
Google Scholar
PubMed
cemented) were included. Articles describing allergic reactions on hip prosthesis and/or cobalt and articles reporting only local problems around the hip such as adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR), ARMD and aseptic lymphocytic vasculitis
School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Australia
Search for other papers by Richard N. de Steiger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stephen E. Graves in
Google Scholar
PubMed
options associated with both total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) including overall outcomes for all diagnoses and all types for revisions, and outcomes for specific revision diagnoses such as prosthesis dislocation, or revision for
Search for other papers by Clemens Clar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lukas Leitner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Amir Koutp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Georg Hauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laura Rasic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andreas Leithner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Patrick Sadoghi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, survival rates of implants have improved over the last decades ( 22 ). In the past, the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, in particular, has provided data that significantly reduced revision rates by offering annual feedback on outcome data from the
Search for other papers by Riccardo D’Ambrosi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicola Ursino in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
Search for other papers by Carmelo Messina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Federico Della Rocca in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael Tobias Hirschmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction The capsule of the hip joint is a cylindrical-shaped arrangement of dense fibres connecting the acetabulum and femur through firm proximal attachments to the acetabular periosteum and distal attachments to the inter
Search for other papers by Bart G. Pijls in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jennifer M. T. A. Meessen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Keith Tucker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Susanna Stea in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Liza Steenbergen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anne Marie Fenstad in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Keijo Mäkelä in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ioan Cristian Stoica in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maxim Goncharov in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Søren Overgaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
Instituto de Biomedicina (IBIOMED). Universidad de León, León, Spain
Search for other papers by Jorge Arias de la Torre in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Search for other papers by Anne Lübbeke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ola Rolfson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rob G. H. H. Nelissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
They can be considered the first generation of metal-on-metal total hip replacement (MOM-THR). Their metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) counterpart was Charnley’s low friction arthroplasty. 1 The Charnley MoP prosthesis had lower rates of early aseptic
Search for other papers by Georgios Kyriakopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lazaros Poultsides in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Panayiotis Christofilopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction The anterior approach to the hip was originally described by Carl Hueter in 1817, in his work Der Grundriss der Chirurgie. However, it was Smith-Petersen who popularized the approach in the US and the English-speaking world, after
Search for other papers by Nikolaos Patsiogiannis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Center, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
Search for other papers by Nikolaos K. Kanakaris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Center, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
Search for other papers by Peter V. Giannoudis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
classification has also been proposed, which divides patients into those with previously ‘happy’ vs. ‘unhappy hips’, based on the presence of radiographic or clinical evidence (prior to the fracture event) of a failing prosthesis. 4 More recently, the UCS