University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Swiss Orthopaedics, Grandvaux, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Claudio Rosso in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mark E Morrey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael O Schär in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Shoulder and Elbow, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
Search for other papers by Kushtrim Grezda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by the Swiss Orthopaedics Shoulder Elbow and Expert Group † in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, augmentation did not translate into improved clinical outcomes at 1 year ( 46 ). Another prospective randomized study published by D’Ambrosii et al. aimed to compare the efficacy of L-PRP augmentation to surgery alone on clinical outcomes of 40 patients
Bone and Joint Research Team of Degeneration and Injury, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
Search for other papers by Di Zhao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bone and Joint Research Team of Degeneration and Injury, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
Search for other papers by Ling-feng Zeng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bone and Joint Research Team of Degeneration and Injury, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
Search for other papers by Gui-hong Liang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jian-ke Pan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ming-hui Luo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yan-hong Han in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Guangdong Second Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital (Guangdong Province Engineering Technology Research Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, China
The fifth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
Search for other papers by Jun Liu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wei-yi Yang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-controlled, dose-ranging, dose-loading phase II study . Clinical Therapeutics 2016 38 1435 – 1450 . ( https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.030 ) 32. Kivitz AJ Gimbel JS Bramson C Nemeth MA Keller DS Brown MT West CR Verburg KM . Efficacy
Search for other papers by Önder İ. Kılıçoğlu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mehmet Demirel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Şamil Aktaş in
Google Scholar
PubMed
regions to prevent these regions from the onset and recurrence of DFU, which is done by encouraging effective pressure off-loading. 28 , 33 , 34 Nevertheless, the efficacy and feasibility of these techniques are rarely studied in clinical practice
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for other papers by Xun Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aiqi Zhang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wenchao Yao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Haiyan Qiu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fabo Feng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
categories – #1 and #4: Clinical Outcomes, #2 and #6: Surgical Technique, #3: Surgical Efficacy, and #5: Surgical Safety. It was evident from the figure that the TLIF technique itself and the efficacy of TLIF in treating lumbar disorders were hot research
Search for other papers by Valentina Viglione in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Angelo Boffa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Davide Previtali in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francesca Vannini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cesare Faldini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Surgery, EOC, Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lugano, Switzerland
Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Giuseppe Filardo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
for foot problems ( 60 , 61 ). This finding is of high clinical relevance and questions the real efficacy of the conservative treatments used for the management of plantar fasciitis. In fact, an improvement reported after a hypothetically effective
Search for other papers by Maria Anna Smolle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joanna Szkandera in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dimosthenis Andreou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Emanuela Palmerini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marko Bergovec in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andreas Leithner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
respective studies. Furthermore, study limitations, levels of evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine Levels of Evidence Scale, 10 and clinical efficacy in distinct histological subtypes were documented. Fig. 1 PRISMA
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other papers by Søren Overgaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
Search for other papers by Thomas M Grupp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Technical University Delft, Delft, the Netherlands
Search for other papers by Rob GHH Nelissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luca Cristofolini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK
Search for other papers by Anne Lübbeke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marcus Jäger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matthias Fink in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sabine Rusch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hassan Achakri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francesco Benazzo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dario Bergadano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Georg N Duda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christian Kaddick in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Volkmar Jansson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Klaus-Peter Günther in
Google Scholar
PubMed
specific amount of clinical documentation is required to receive the CE mark and to regularly provide proof of clinical safety and efficacy. The documentation must contain sufficient information for the assessment of safety and performance when used as
Search for other papers by Alessandro Bensa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alessandro Sangiorgio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Angelo Boffa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Manuela Salerno in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Giacomo Moraca in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Applied and Translational Research (ATR) Center, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
Università della Svizzera Italiana, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Lugano, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Giuseppe Filardo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
investigate which patient categories could benefit the most from each individual product in order to maximize treatment efficacy and tailor the therapy to the specific patient characteristics, optimizing the management of knee OA in the clinical practice
Search for other papers by Jean-Charles Le Huec in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stephane Bourret in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wendy Thompson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christian Daulouede in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thibault Cloché in
Google Scholar
PubMed
pain: a randomized clinical trial with 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up postpartum . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005 ; 30 : 850 – 856 . 15. Stuge B Veierød MB Laerum E Vøllestad N . The efficacy of a treatment
Search for other papers by Mukai Chimutengwende-Gordon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by James Donaldson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by George Bentley in
Google Scholar
PubMed
regarding the clinical efficacy of gene therapy. Conclusions The current methods commonly used clinically to treat osteochondral lesions mainly result in fibrocartilage formation and are only suitable for the treatment of small defects less than 2